Sept. 22


TEXAS----impending executions

Man set to die next week in Texas loses appeal


A federal appeals court has refused to stop next week's scheduled execution of a former Army recruiter convicted in the rape-slaying of a woman in Fort Worth more than 10 years ago.

Cleve Foster is set to die Tuesday in Huntsville for the death of a 30-year-old Sudanese woman known as Mary Pal. Her body was found in a Tarrant County ditch. She'd been shot in the head.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Friday rejected appeals to delay the punishment. Foster's lawyers contended he's innocent and had poor legal help at his trial and in earlier appeals. They say they'll now go to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has stopped his execution three previous times.

A 2nd man condemned for the slaying died of cancer in 2010.

(source: Associated Press)

***************

Stop the Execution of Anthony Haynes in Texas


http://takeaction.amnestyusa.org/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?c=6oJCLQPAJiJUG&b=6645049&aid=518893

(source: Amnesty International USA)






MISSISSIPPI:

Judge adds 185 years to Cox's death-penalty sentence for wife's murder


"Kim got justice," her mother said after a Union County jury sentenced David Neal Cox Sr. to death for her 2010 murder.

Cox stood ramrod straight in the courtroom as Judge John Gregory set his execution date for Nov. 26, 2012.

But it's not likely to happen then because automatic appeals begin.

After the 12-member jury exited the room, Gregory sentenced Cox to 185 years on seven other charges from kidnappings and sexual assaults to shooting into an occupied building. The time will run consecutively.

In effect, even if Cox somehow beats the death penalty sentence, he will spend the rest of his life in prison.

Kim's mother, Melody Kirk, also said she wasn't quite sure how she felt as her family's personal nightmare closed in court.

District Attorney Ben Creekmore said he was satisfied with the only correct sentence the jury could reach.

Cox's sister wept as she embraced Kim's mother and father. "I'm so sorry," she said as tears streamed down her face.

(source: NE Mississippi Journal)






PENNSYLVANIA:

Adams death-penalty trial starts Monday ---- Carroll Valley man faces death penalty in the shooting death of a wildlife conservation officer.


Both the prosecution and the defense have spent close to 2 years building their cases.

An out-of-town jury was selected, many witnesses and experts will be brought in to testify, and the fate of a man accused of killing a wildlife conservation officer on a November night in 2010 will be decided.

The trial of Christopher L. Johnson, 29, of Carroll Valley, is scheduled to start Monday morning in Adams County court.

Johnson faces the death penalty for allegedly shooting and killing Wildlife Conservation Officer David L. Grove after he pulled him over on suspicion of illegally shooting a deer.

Adams County District Court Administrator Donald Fennimore said this will be the 1st death penalty trial in Adams County since 1999 when Edward Siebor III faced charges in the murders of Phillip Hoover, and his wife, Rachel.

Capital trials are never an easy thing for anyone involved, especially, perhaps, the jury.

"The jury has the unenviable task of deciding 'does he get life or death?'" said University of Pittsburgh law professor John Burkoff. "It's almost always traumatic, and they are almost always tragic. And it's almost always sad, too."

Death penalty trials

Death-penalty trials come in 2 phases - the guilt phase and the capital-sentencing hearing.

Burkoff explained that the guilt phase is conducted like a typical trial. The prosecution lays out its case before a jury, then the defense gets a chance to present its side.

After the parties make their closing arguments, the jury deliberates, and comes to a unanimous verdict of either "guilty" or "not guilty."

But in death-penalty trials in which the jury comes back with a guilty verdict, the case enters a capital sentencing hearing in which a different defense attorney has a chance to present mitigating evidence to the jury, explaining why the now-convicted defendant committed the crime, Burkoff said.

This phase can include testimony from family members, clergymen, former teachers, friends and anyone who knew the defendant well, and can help the defense outline the circumstances of the defendant's past that Burkoff said do not excuse his actions, but may help explain them. Testimony could cover childhood traumas, addictions or psychological problems that did not give rise to a good insanity defense.

"Even when we have a defendant who is clearly guilty, and clearly deserves severe punishment, it's often the case we see the factors in his life that led him to do it," Burkoff said.

The prosecution has a chance to counter those mitigating circumstances by laying out the aggravating factors that led to the death penalty being sought in the 1st place.

Then it's in the hands the jury, who must unanimously decide whether to impose the death penalty. They have only 2 options - death, or life in prison without the possibility of parole.

"It's pretty awful to be picked as a juror, then have to decide if someone lives or dies," Burkoff said. "It's a tough burden to place on ordinary people.

The Johnson case

Johnson is accused of shooting and killing Grove on Nov. 11, 2010.

According to court documents, Grove pulled over Johnson's vehicle on Schriver Road on suspicion Johnson had illegally shot a deer. Johnson allegedly told his passenger, Ryan Laumann, of Fairfield, that it was illegal for him to carry a gun because he was a felon, and he did not want to go Grove to jail again.

Johnson got out of the truck, and exchanged fire with Grove, who was pronounced dead at the scene, court documents indicate.

Johnson, who was wounded, fled, dropping off Laumann along the way.

Following a nightlong manhunt, Johnson was arrested the next morning on a trail off Orrtanna Road.

Johnson faces charges of murder in the 1st and 3rd degrees, persons not to possess firearms, flight to avoid apprehension, firearms not to be carried without a license, possessing an instrument of crime, resisting or interfering with an officer, unlawful use of lights while hunting, and unlawful taking of big game.

Judge Michael A. George is presiding over the case. He issued an order this week limiting the number of members of the public who can watch the trial. Each morning at 8 a.m., 42 public passes will be made available.

Additionally, President Judge John D. Kuhn banned firearms, with limited exceptions, from the courthouse.

Fennimore said the trial is slated to last two weeks, but the court is prepared if it goes longer.

The last death penalty trial

Often in death-penalty cases, a plea agreement is reached just short of trial, or sometimes in the middle of it, which Burkoff said could be an ideal situation for both sides.

"The defense counsel is in a situation where they would be saving their client's life, and the prosecutor would be guaranteeing a conviction and guaranteeing this defendant never sees the light of day outside of prison ever again," Burkoff said.

That's what happened in Adams County's last death penalty trial.

In that case, Fennimore said, the death penalty trial began for Edward Siebor III in 1999, but Siebor took a plea before the trial concluded.

Siebor and his brother, Joseph Siebor, pleaded guilty to murdering an Abbottstown couple at the couple's home in 1994. Their arrests came 5 years after the murders.

Though the death penalty can be sought by prosecutors in first-degree murder cases, no one has been executed in Pennsylvania since 1999.

The last case heard in Adams County resulting in execution was a half-century ago, when the Montgomery County homicide case against Elmo Smith was moved to Adams County. Smith was convicted of the 1959 brutal rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl, and was executed in the electric chair in 1962.

(source: The Evening Sun)

************************

Radio Smart Talk: Capital punishment and the Terrance Williams case


Convicted murderer Terrance "Terry" Williams is the 1st man set to be executed in Pennsylvania in 13 years. But his lawyers are trying to save the 46-year-old man's life just ahead of his October 3rd execution date.

Last week, the state Board of Pardons voted 3-2 to recommend Governor Corbett to grant clemency to Williams. The decision fell short of the unanimous vote needed for the Governor to do so. So, in a last attempt to save their client from being executed next month, Williams' attorneys are asking the board to reconsider its decision.

But there are several issues complicating the case. Allegations are swirling that Williams, who has been convicted of killing 2 men in 1984, was sexually abused by one of his victims as a boy. There are also questions regarding the withholding of evidence at his 1986 trial.

On Monday's Radio Smart Talk, we'll talk about the case and the treatment of capital offenders in Pennsylvania. Criminal defense attorney Jules Epstein from Widener Law will join the conversation. Epstein has represented several death row inmates in Pennsylvania and teaches courses on criminal law and evidence.

Spero Lappas, an attorney and Pennsylvanians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty board member, will also serve as a guest.

(source: WITF)






MISSOURI:

Reggie Clemons Hearing: More To Come


The Special Master hearing to review the Reggie Clemons case was halted on Thursday, but with more testimony and legal filings to come. In fact, the Special Master process looks to continue well into next year. Given what's at stake, and given the troubling nature of the case, taking more time is not a bad thing.

The allegations of police brutality and prosecutorial misconduct which feature prominently in Amnesty International's report on the case were highlighted during the hearing. The alleged police abuse of Clemons, and the similar abuse of the state�s star witness Tom Cummins � acknowledged by a $150,000 settlement � are particularly disturbing and call into question the fairness of the investigation and prosecution in this case.

DNA testing, which the state argued connected one of the co-defendants to the crime, took center stage on Thursday, while Monday and Wednesday (there were no witnesses heard on Tuesday), the treatment of Reggie Clemons in police custody, and the prosecutor�s apparent editing of Tom Cummins' statement to police, were featured.

As this process moves forward, with depositions and legal briefs, and perhaps closing arguments later this year, this review of the problematic investigation and prosecution of Reggie Clemons, and the doubt and confusion those problems have caused, will continue to provide a good example of why the irreversible punishment of death should have no place in our imperfect criminal justice system.

(source: Brian Evans, Amnesty International USA blog)

*********************

Reggie Clemons: a final chance to save his lifeClemons, who has spent almost 20 years on death row, makes last-ditch effort to clear his name over murder of sisters in 1991


After almost 2 decades on death row, a scheduled execution date that brought him within 12 days of death by lethal injection, and multiple appeals and petitions, Reggie Clemons this week was given his final chance to save his own life.

Over 4 dramatic days of testimony, a courtroom in St Louis packed with relatives and friends of both the prisoner and his two alleged victims was taken on a legal white-knuckle ride. The court heard conflicting evidence that damages Clemons' hopes of proving his innocence but also supports his contention that he was sentenced to death as a result of an unfair trial.

Clemons' efforts to clear his name emerged battered from the four-day hearing after he was warned by the presiding judge, Michael Manners, that his refusal to answer questions about what happened at the crime scene 21 years ago would work against him. Clemons pleaded the 5th amendment in response to 29 questions, but was told by the judge that the constitutional safeguard against self-incrimination that the amendment affords would not protect him in this case.

Clemons was convicted along with 3 other co-defendants of the April 1991 murder of 2 young sisters, Julie and Robin Kerry. The 4 were accused of raping the women, then pushing them off the disused Chain of Rocks bridge over the Mississippi river where they drowned.

Clemons, now 41, has always pleaded his innocence. In an interview with the Guardian conducted in prison several months ago, he said: "I know, and God knows I'm not a rapist. I know I'm not a murderer or a killer. I know that I didn't do any of these things. I know I'm innocent."

Clemons was scheduled to be executed in 2009, but was spared death on that occasion less than two weeks beforehand in a dispute over the lethal injection drugs that were to be used. Soon after, the Missouri supreme court agreed to grant him one last special review of his death sentence after new evidence emerged that supported Clemons' claim that the confession he had made in 1991 to raping one of the sisters had been beaten out of him.

The new evidence involved the revelation that the star prosecution witness in Clemons' trial � Thomas Cummins, a cousin of the Kerry sisters who had been on the bridge with them that night � had received a payment of $150,000 to settle a dispute with St Louis police. Cummins had claimed the police had beaten a confession out of him, in terms that were remarkably similar to Reggie Clemons's account of his alleged forced confession.

Clemons' lead lawyer, Josh Levine, argued in opening statements that there had been "craven violations" of the legal process by police and prosecutors. "Reggie did not receive a fair trial, and a death sentence is not appropriate in this case � his death sentence should be set aside and he should receive a new trial."

But when the Missouri attorney general's office came to defend the death sentence, the tide turned against Clemons. After taking the stand, Clemons initially denied that he had killed the women or taken part in any plan to do so.

But then, when he was bombarded with a further 32 searing questions about what happened on the bridge that night, he refused to answer. The questions included: "Is it true the girls were fighting when they were being raped?"; "Did you rape both girls or only one?"; "Did you throw the girls' clothes off the bridge?"; "Did you say afterwards 'Let's go, we threw them off'?"

After each question, Clemons said: "On advice of my counsel, I plead the 5th."

Only after Manners had cautioned him to think carefully about what he was doing did Clemons return to the stand and answer 3 of the questions, denying that he had prevented the sisters from escaping from under the bridge before they were allegedly pushed in the water by his cousin Antonio Richardson.

New DNA evidence was also presented by the DA's office � evidence that was inconclusive in regard to Clemons but that implicated Marlin Gray, one of his co-defendants who was executed in 2005. DNA traces that under testing were deemed "very likely" to have come from one of the Kerry sisters were discovered both on a used condom found on the bridge, and on stains on Gray's trousers and underpants.

The 2 other defendants in the case were Richardson, whose initial death sentence was commuted to life without parole, and Daniel Winfrey, the only white member of the group of 4, who pleaded guilty in a deal with prosecutors and was then released on parole in 2007.

Though aspects of the hearing were problematic for Clemons in his bid to avoid the death chamber, evidence presented to the judge also proved to be highly embarrassing for the Missouri authorities. The court heard of alleged flagrant procedural abuses by the prosecuting authorities that raise fundamental questions about the application of the death penalty in modern America.

Clemons' mother, Vera Thomas, testified that when police turned up at her house to arrest her son, they advised her that there was no need for him to have a lawyer, even though he was facing interrogation over a double murder. The judge also heard that the chief prosecutor, Nels Moss, had attempted to have crucial police records altered, scrawling in his own handwriting proposed revisions to an official report of an interview with a key witness in which he had not participated.

Moss also admitted under questioning that either senior police detectives involved in the case, or Thomas Cummins, the prosecution's star witness, must have lied under oath at the Reggie Clemons trial. During the trial, Cummins told the jury that he had been beaten by police in the hours following the death of his cousins, at a time when he was the prime suspect.

The allegation that they treated him brutally in order to get him to confess � a charge that Clemons also made � was flatly denied by detectives. Moss conceded that Cummins and the detectives could not have both been telling the truth.

The emotional impact of such powerful evidence was palpable in the courtroom. Along with Reggie Clemons's mother was Ginny Kenny, the mother of the 2 sisters, and a grandmother of Marlin Gray.

Ginny Kerry, who broke down while opening statements were read, spoke to the Guardian during the hearing. She expressed her anger that more than 20 years after she lost her children she was still having to listen to what she called Clemons' lies.

"He confessed to killing my children 21 years ago, and now it's all about 'poor Reggie'. Gee, I wonder if my kids were hurting when they were being beaten and raped, their clothes being torn off of them in the cold night by strange, horrible men."

Kerry added: "He needs to be executed. He executed my children, did he not?"

The wider family of the 2 victims, including their sister Jamie Kerry, also put out an angry and passionate statement in which they accused Clemons of engaging in "elaborate distractions" and blamed the news media for being "such malleable and wilful participants in this charade".

The ultimate decision on whether Clemons will live or die is probably still months away. It will be taken by the Missouri supreme court, acting with the benefit of the recommendation that Manners will produce. The judge has asked both sets of legal teams to present him with final written pleadings by 1 December.

Manners' recommendation could run the full gamut of legal options. He could make the case for Clemons to be freed outright, a new trial, commutation of his sentence to life, or his return to death row pending an execution that would then almost certainly go ahead.

(source: The Guardian)






ALABAMA:

Convicted killer sentenced to death


An Alabama judge has overturned a jury's recommendation and sentenced a convicted killer to the death penalty.

Judge Jacob Walker overturned the jury's recommendation and sentenced Gregory Lance Henderson to death by lethal injection Thursday in the Lee County Circuit Court.

In October 2011, a jury convicted Henderson in the capital murder of Lee County Sheriff's Deputy James Anderson and in a 9-to-3 vote recommended life with parole.

Henderson ran over Deputy Anderson with his car during a routine traffic stop in 2009.

"It is something we in the law enforcement community felt it was an appropriate sentence based on the crime. It is never acceptable in our society for someone to deliberately take the life of a law enforcement officer in the performance of his or her duties," expressed Lee County Sheriff Jay Jones.

This was Henderson's 2nd hearing in regards to sentencing. The 1st was delayed due to the finding of phone recordings made by Henderson in the Russell County Jail. These recordings apparently showed Henderson's lack of remorse and violent tendencies.

"My 1st thoughts are with the family, James' widow and his 2 children. They have been 3 years, as of Monday, for justice in this case and it came in the form of sentence to death," says Jones.

After the verdict was read, Henderson was immediately transported to the Holman prison in Atmore, Alabama where he currently sits

(source: WTVM)

_______________________________________________
DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty

Search the Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/deathpenalty@lists.washlaw.edu/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A free service of WashLaw
http://washlaw.edu
(785)670.1088
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to