July 9


SOMALIA:

Makkah Al-Mukarama Hotel Bombing Suspect Sentenced to Death


A Somali military court sentenced al-Shabaab member Awiye Ahmed Jama to death Monday (July 7th) after determining he was involved in the bombing of Makkah Al-Mukarama Hotel in November, Somalia's Alshahid reported.

"Awiye Ahmed Jama told to court he is member of al-Shabaab. He also acknowledged that he was behind an explosion in hotel Makkah Al-Mukarama," Somali military court chairman Colonel Liban Ali Yarow said. "He is criminal so the court sentenced him [to] death penalty."

Jama, 25, had trained for nine months in the al-Shabaab-held town of Bulo Marer before attempting to carry out the attack, the court said according to Somalia's Mareeg.

Jama was arrested November 8, 2013, after trying to blow himself up inside the hotel using an explosive-laden laptop. Minutes before his arrest, al-Shabaab carried out a car bomb explosion outside the hotel, killing 4 people and wounding 15.

Among the dead was one of Somalia's top diplomats, former acting ambassador to London Abdulkadir Aden Ali "Dhuub".

(source: All Africa News)






CHINA:

Chinese executions amd international law


2 Ugandans have recently been executed in the People's Republic of China for offences relating to drug trafficking. My condolences go out to the families of the deceased.

In Uganda there has been a public outcry on whether this was right and what our Government in particular ministry of foreign affairs can do to save the other Ugandans on death row and those incarcerated in Chinese Prisons.

Whereas I do not condone the death penalty because it is inhuman and degrading and other personal sentiments, I pray we look at the issue objectively and in light of international law principles.

The International Convention on Civil and Political Rights ("ICCPR") to which Uganda and China are a party, spells out the principles in International law that member states adhere to. I will highlight 2 principles that are the subject of my discussion.

The 1st is the principle of sovereignty of states. This is a far and wide principle but it includes the fact that a country is free to do what is lawful in its territorial jurisdiction without interference from the outside world. Territorial sovereignty is particularly enshrined under article 1 of the Convention which states "All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development."

This issue is married to Article 2(1) of the ICCPR which provides that Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. This means that as long as you cross into the boundaries of the State, the laws of that State are applicable to you regardless of sex, nationality or other status. The Chinese people have exercised this right of self-determination and have gone ahead to provide in their laws for punishments such as death for economic crimes such as drug trafficking, embezzlement and bribery. That is their law and when caught at the other end of the law, the consequences although inhumane according to some scholars, they are lawful according to the Chinese people and legislation.

The Second Principle is that of the inherent right to life. In this respect, the ICCPR has provided for the right to life and the death penalty has not survived mention in the ICCPR. Article 6(1) and (2) provide that

Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.

Clause 2 of the same article 6 provides that in countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime (emphasis mine) and not contrary to the provisions of the present Covenant and to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This penalty can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a competent court.

This literally means that whereas the right to life is inherent, it can be taken away lawfully by the state. The ICCPR recognizes that some states may not completely do away with the death penalty and emphasizes that if it MUST be carried out, it should be done lawfully and after final judgement rendered by a competent court.

I have taken some time to look at the judicial system in China and how these executions are finally carried out. It is not as draconian as the ordinary man is made to think. The Republic of China actually confirms the death penalty through the highest court of the land which is the Supreme Court and no one is executed until the Supreme Court affirms this sentence. It is also a mechanism in the Chinese laws that an appeal all the way upto the Supreme Court is automatic even if the convict is unwilling to appeal. It is a system of double appeals that is a MUST.

In addition there is usually a 2 year probation after the confirmation of the sentence where ones sentence may be converted to life imprisonment.

With the principle of state sovereignty and the right to life, China has exercised this right and drafted laws that call for execution where one is convicted of a crime such as drug trafficking and where this is lawfully carried out, the Republic is not to blame and ordinarily other states should not interfere with such a decision.

(source: Ian Mutibwa, New Vision)






SOUTH KOREA:

Report: S. Korean ferry operators prioritized profits over safety


The operators of the sunken Sewol ferry prioritized profit over safety, and the vessel was licensed based on falsified documents, South Korean investigators said in an interim report.

At least 292 people, including more than 200 high school students, died after the ferry sank in April. 11 people remain missing.

Ferry CEO charged with negligence The government's Audit and Inspection Board said the disaster was a man-made accident. It added that the Korean Register of Shipping licensed the modified vessel based on falsified documents. It didn't elaborate.

Investigators have said a vast amount of cargo, more than double the ferry's limit, and the failure to tie it down properly were partly responsible for the capsizing of the Sewol, which was carrying 476 passengers and crew.

The board said it is planning to reprimand officials from the Korean Register of Shipping, the Maritime Ministry and the Korea Shipping Association, which were found to have not performed properly safety protocols on the Sewol.

The board also said officials from the Coast Guard and Ministry of Security and Public Administration performed poorly in the initial response to the disaster.

The Sewol ferry was headed from Incheon to Jeju island on April 16 when it capsized. Most of the passengers were high school students on a field trip.

The captain, Lee Joon-seok, and three of his crew members face murder charges. If convicted, they could face the death penalty, although it has been nearly 2 decades since capital punishment was last carried out in South Korea.

Lee has pleaded not guilty. His attorney has said the captain is already living with guilt because he left the ferry before everybody was rescued.

Other crew members have been indicted on charges of abandonment and violating a ship safety act.

(source: CNN)



QATAR:

Doha court postpones Jennifer Brown murder trial until November


Following lengthy delays, the trial of a Kenyan security guard accused of killing American teacher Jennifer Brown has once again been adjourned, this time for 4 months.

The court will pick the case back up on Nov. 10, about 2 years after the 40-year-old was killed in her Al Sadd apartment in 2012.

A Kenyan security guard is on trial for her murder, but one of the reasons for the delay has involved his difficulty in retaining a lawyer.

A public defender appointed to him quit the case some months ago, and another lawyer the defendant hired dropped out shortly before a hearing last month convened.

The defendant now has new legal counsel, who today requested more time to get up to speed on the case, and to cross-examine witnesses.

When reached by phone at their home in Pennsylvania, Brown's parents both expressed dismay at the latest adjournment.

Robert Brown said, "It's just disappointing, you know. I don't know what else to say. This doesn't seem right."

His wife, Mary Brown, said: "All I can say is that I hope he gets what he deserves. He took my little girl away from me. She was my little girl."

The absence of key witnesses is another factor that has contributed to the lengthy trial, which began in June 2013. At that time, a psychiatric evaluation was ordered for the defendant.

However, a year later, the doctor who spoke with the defendant has not appeared in court despite being summoned nearly half a dozen times.

The trial's pace is markedly different than that of Lauren Patterson's, a British teacher whose killer was sentenced to death in March, only five months after he and his accomplice were arrested. The case is now in appeals court.

Both teachers' cases, which may have involved sexual assault as well as murder, have been closely watched by many of Qatar's residents, especially single female expats.

If found guilty, the guard, like Patterson's murderer, faces the death penalty - though notably, Qatar has not carried out any executions in over a decade.

According to previous witness testimony, the security guard was arrested and reportedly confessed to the crime a few days after Brown???s body was found in her apartment, half-naked and wrapped in a comforter on her bed.

When the hearings resume in November, a police officer and forensic examiner are expected to testify.

(source: Doha News)






THAILAND:

Girl's killing unleashes media storm for law reform; SRT chief under pressure to quit


Social media has been in overdrive since midnight Monday when Wanchai Sangkhao, 22, an employee of the State Railway of Thailand, allegedly confessed that he had raped, murdered and thrown a 13-year-old girl from a train.

By early morning yesterday, social media was flooded with comments on the rape-and-murder case after the body of the girl - who went missing between Surat Thani and Bangkok - was found near the railway track in Prachuab Khiri Khan's Pran Buri district.

Comments showed that many people had been deeply saddened by this criminal case, with several calling for the laws to be changed and rapists and murderers to be given the death sentence. Several people in show business launched a "put rapists and murderers to death" demand on Instagram.

For instance, Panadda Wongphudee (@boompanadda) launched a campaign for 100,000 names to push for the death sentence and won a lot of support.

Other actors and actresses, like Chermarn Boonyasak (@Chermarn), TOP Ddaraneenute (@topdaraneenute), kiksuwatjaneeetrin Wattanasin (@jjetrin), Sheranut Yusananda (@namcha_tea), and Sarawit Subun (@kong_sarawit), joined Instagram a campaign "rape = put to death punishment".

Even Miss Thailand World 2014, Nonthawan "Maeya" Thongleng (@maeyagirl_mtw2014) signed up.

It is not just the celebrities who are pushing for a change in the law. Many social-media users say that death should be the only penalty for rapists and murderers - posts that have received many "likes" and "shares".

In fact, some even proposed that the rapist's penis be cut off so they do not rape again, but not everybody agreed. Some even said that cutting off the penis would not help as "they can potentially rape with other things".

On the other hand, some comments rejected this campaign, reasoning that the death penalty might not be the answer as a rapist may decide to murder his victim, as the penalty is the same for either offence.

Instead, they said, there should be a strict enforcement of law and the punishment for murder should never be reduced even if the murderers confess. They also said rape scenes depicted in television soap operas should be censored.

Many people have also called on the governor of State Railway of Thailand, Prapat Chongsanguan, to step down and take responsibility for this case. Many were strident about his early messages that contradicted the evidence, saying "nothing had disappeared" following the discovery of clothes and bloodstained bed sheets.

Prapat also declared "the murderer was not an employee of State Railway of Thailand but worked for a private company as an outsourcer to State Railway of Thailand".

A document containing Wanchai's name on the list of employees of State Railway of Thailand was posted and shared on social media, and many people called for Prapat to be sacked.

People also complained about the poor quality of rail services, including old trains, bad and inefficient railway employees. Many even brought up a similar rape case on a train in 2001.

Separately, many journalists on social media shared a warning issued by the Thai Journalists Association yesterday for members of the media to professionally follow the code of conduct and keep in mind the child-protection law and human rights.

People have also been warned to not share any information or images that would damage the victim or the family.

(source: Phuket Gazette)

****************

Rape-and-murder convicts must face death: netizens


Amid furore over the grisly fate of 13yearold on a train, pressure mounts on SRT governor to resign

Concerned citizens have called for mandatory death sentence for rape-and-murder crimes, in an angry and swift reaction to the tragic rape and murder on Sunday night of a 13-year-old victim by a State Railway of Thailand employee on a moving train.

Administrators and members of many Facebook pages have launched campaigns to rally public support for the legal-amendment drive, while similar attempts were under way on the online petition service www.change.org even before Sunday's tragedy.

A Facebook account with more than 6,000 members has arranged a public gathering in front of Siam Paragon shopping mall in downtown Bangkok at 11am on Saturday. Attendees have been urged to dress in black in memory of the victim, an unnamed eighth-grade student identified by the nickname of Kaem, who studied at a Nonthaburi school.

The campaign site www.change.org had drawn more than 21,000 signatures out of a total of 50,000 required to push for a legal amendment after a rape-and-murder case in Bangkok last year. Some other activities on Change.org include campaigns to ensure that producers of television series do not play up scripts about sexual offences against females in their shows, and stricter supervision in this area by the broadcast regulator.

The reaction on social media and a public rally are a rare swift response in Thailand over a sexual crime. The response is comparable to the uproar in India last year over the gang rape of a woman on a bus, who was later thrown off the moving vehicle.

Apart from seeking mandatory execution of rape-and-murder convicts, the campaigners also called on the judicial authorities not to pardon or commute prison terms of convicted sexual offenders.

The Criminal Code sentences rapists to jail terms from four to 20 years in general cases of rape, while aggravated offences in which the rape victim is killed on purpose or where death is caused through violent sex acts are punishable by death. The campaigners, however, want rape-and-murder convicts to face the death penalty without exception.

A number of female celebrities posted messages on their social-media sites offering their condolences to the victim and her family while joining awareness campaigns and the drive for legal amendment.

Former Miss Thailand Panadda Wongphudee issued a statement calling on sympathisers to supply photocopies of their identity cards to push for the amendment to increase penalties for convicted sex offenders.

The Women and Men Progressive Movement Foundation demanded that SRT governor Prapat Chongsanguan take responsibility and resign. Director Chadet Chaowilai said the crime was not acceptable and would cause great concern among Thai and foreign passengers.

The StopDrink organisation said the sale of alcohol on the trains was deemed one of the reasons behind nuisances, quarrels, accidents and sexual violations that affected general passengers, citing a survey it conducted late last year on 1,160 respondents. A large majority of the respondents backed a ban on alcohol consumption on trains and the sale of liquor at train stations, said Theera Watcharapranee.

Child-rights activist Wallop Tangkhananurak voiced his support for heavier penalties. He also opposed pardon or reduced prison sentences for convicted sex offenders on auspicious occasions. He said the SRT could give no excuses for such an incident and in other countries senior officials would have handed in their resignations.

The National Council for Peace and Order has assigned military and police units to take care of security measures on trains. NCPO spokesman Colonel Winthai Suvari said that although yesterday's meeting did not discuss the murder in particular, the junta leadership expressed concern over the issue.

(source: The Nation)

****************

Thailand horrified after 13-year-old girl raped, thrown from train


The distraught mother of a 13-year-old girl raped and thrown from a sleeper train en route to Bangkok has told of her daughter's dreams for the future, amid angry calls for a mandatory death penalty for child rapists.

"She wanted to be an angel, she wanted to be an air hostess," her mother said of Nong Kaem. "If she was still here I would do everything to support her, but now I have nothing left."

Kaem's sister, one of two who was traveling with her on the overnight train from southern Thailand on Saturday, wrote on Facebook of her guilt at not being able to protect her. "Kaem, I am so sorry that I failed to look after you. I am a terrible sister. Please forgive me," she wrote, according to the Bangkok Post.

Journey turned to horror

It was Kaem's 1st time on a train.

She was returning from the city of Surat Thai with her 2 sisters and 1 of their boyfriends to the Thai capital Bangkok, a popular route for tourists going to and from the country's popular southern beaches.

They were sharing a sleeping carriage, and turned in for the night. By the morning Kaem was gone.

Police searched the train and the track as the teenager's frantic family turned to the media for help in finding her.

3 days later, her body was found naked near the track; she'd been raped, suffocated and tossed out of a window by her attacker who told police he had been drinking and was high on methamphetamine, according to Police Major General Thanet Soonthornsuk.

To design or change a law base on emotions and hatred will never produce effective law.

Police named Kaem's alleged murderer as 22-year-old railway employee Wanchai Saengkhao.

They said he confessed to the crime after he was tracked down via his victim's mobile phone. Wanchai sold the girl's phone to a shop owner in Bangkok, who took a copy of his I.D. which was later passed to police.

Police said Wanchai admitted carrying the sleeping child to another carriage where he raped and strangled her, before throwing her lifeless body out the window as the train passed through the Pranburi District in Prachuabkirikan Province.

Wanchai has been charged with murder, rape of a child under 15 years old and theft, police said.

He faces possible execution for the murder charge, but activists are using the case to call for tougher charges for child rape, which currently carries a jail term of 4 to 20 years and a fine of up to 40,000 baht ($1,200).

Rage vented online

The reaction on social media was swift and scathing as angry Thais bombarded Wanchai's Facebook page with abusive messages. The page is no longer available.

Junta leader, army chief General Prayuth Chan-ocha, expressed his sorrow, and the former transport minister, Chatchart Sitthipan, said he took the blame for failing to do more when he was in charge of the railway.

"It is the worst news in many years for the State Railway of Thailand and the Ministry of Transport. I feel that I am also responsible for this event, because I did not do my job well enough when I was the Minister," Chatchart said.

As word spread that Kaem had gone missing, Thai actress and former Miss Thailand, Panadda Wongphudee, posted a message on Instagram urging people to back a campaign to change the law under the slogan, "Rape, will be executed."

A Change.org petition was set up calling for the tougher penalties - "no more sentence reduction, parole or pardon" - which at the time of writing had more than 25,000 signatories.

There were also calls for State Railway of Thailand governor Prapas Chongsanguan to step down, as officials scrambled to assure passengers the trains were safe. A ban would be slapped on the sale of alcohol on all trains, they said, and background checks would be stepped up for all employees.

Are new laws the answer?

Amid the anger, some called for calm.

"We have to listen to this news with full consciousness. To design or change a law base on emotions and hatred will never produce effective law. It will only promote more hatred in society," said Dejudom Krairit, Chairman of Lawyers Council of Thailand.

Writing in the Bangkok Post, columnist Sanitsuda Ekachai said: "I seriously doubt if the angry calls for the death penalty as the only punishment for child rapists and rapists/murderers will make our society any safer.

"These calls stem from the belief that this heinous crime was possible because the punishment is not heavy enough. This is not new. We hear such calls every time a shocking rape or murder happens."

(source: CNN)


MALAYSIA:

Malaysian Sentenced to Death for French Tourist Murder


A Malaysian shopkeeper on Wednesday was sentenced to death after a court found him guilty of murdering a French tourist on a popular resort island.

Stephanie Foray, 30, went missing on Tioman island off the east coast state of Pahang in May 2011.

Her partially mummified remains were found some 3 months later buried in a cave on the island.

The verdict comes just weeks after another foreign tourist, British backpacker Gareth Huntley, went missing on the same island during a trek in circumstances that have yet to be fully explained.

A high court in Pahang's capital Kuantan found Asni Omar, 39, who operated a shop selling beach gear on the island, guilty of killing Foray.

After the death sentence was handed down, Foray's mother, Irene Mortel, got up, looked at Asni and wept.

"I was hoping for nothing else. That's all... I know it can't change anything," she said of the verdict as she left the court, together with Foray's father, Joel, who travelled to Malaysia with her.

In delivering the verdict, judge Mariana Yahya said the defence failed to raise reasonable doubt, adding Asni had "weakened his own defence" by merely presenting a "well arranged story" to deny his guilt.

"Therefore I find the defendant guilty as charged. There is only 1 punishment... which is death by hanging," she said.

Asni, who was sitting in dock with short shaved hair and wearing a dark blue shirt with white stripes and jeans, was hugged by crying family members before being led out of the court by police.

Murder carries the mandatory death penalty by hanging in Malaysia.

Asni's lawyers said they would appeal the sentence to a higher court.

Asni was accused of killing Foray, a French civil service employee, after she spurned his advances.

The murder of Foray shocked people in the Muslim-majority country where violent crime against tourists is rare.

Foray had arrived in Malaysia in May 2011 after quitting her job and spending several months in India and Sri Lanka. She took a ferry to Tioman 5 days later and disappeared shortly afterwards.

In another deadly incident on the same island, Huntley went missing while trekking to a jungle waterfall on May 27 this year.

His body was found a week later by a stream not far from a turtle research site where he was volunteering.

Police are still investigating what caused Huntley's death.

(source: NDTV)






ISRAEL:

Yes to death penalty in Israel, in extreme cases


When the bodies of the 3 kidnapped youths - Eyal, Gilad and Naftali were found - I was touring the D-Day beaches in France with 2 of my children. I wanted to commemorate the 70th anniversary of Operation Overlord by explaining to my children that the world had sunk into madness not that long ago, and that we owe our freedom to the foresight of a few leaders and to the sacrifice of many soldiers.

Shortly after leaving the Normandy American cemetery, the terrible news from Israel reached us. As my children and I were coping with the grief, I couldn't help wondering if I hadn't misled them with my lectures on freedom: how free can you claim to be when you can still be murdered for who you are in your own country?

The next day I watched the heartbreaking scene of the three fathers saying the Kaddish prayer for their murdered sons, and of the devastated faces of the bereaved mothers. In the darkness of this inconsolable pain, the unity and dignity of our nation was an almost comforting ray of light. There was a feeling, if not certainty, that we Jews would never go down the road of our enemies thanks to our values and principles. But with the appalling murder of the Palestinian teen Mohamed Abu Khdeir, even that certainty was shattered. Sherri Mandell, whose son Kobi was murdered by Arab terrorists in 2001, asked the murderers of Mohamed question that is hard to answer: "What can we believe about our own society now that you have weakened our integrity?"

True, our thugs and killers are a minority reviled by the mainstream. True, our government (unlike the Palestinian Authority) will not pay a monthly income to their parents and will not name streets and summer camps after them. There still is, thankfully, a moral gap between our enemies and us. But that is no consolation and no excuse. The murder should be a wake-up call for our society.

In addition to soul-searching, we must ask ourselves if we punish murderers adequately. Less than three months ago, on April 14, Baruch Mizrahi was murdered in front of his wife and five children by Ziad Awed, who was among the 1,027 terrorists freed by Israel in exchange for the liberation of soldier Gilad Shalit from Hamas captivity. The freed terrorists also included Ali al-Nasser Yataima, convicted of planning the 2002 Passover massacre, in which 30 civilians were killed and 140 were wounded; Walid Abd al-Aziz, who took part in the execution of the 2002 bombings at Cafe Moment (11 killed), at the Hebrew University (9 killed), and in the town of Rishon-LeZion (16 killed); Maedh Waal Taleb Abu Sharakh, Majdi Muhammad Ahmed Amr and Fadi Muhammad Ibrahim al-Jaaba, who are responsible for the attack on bus No. 37 in Haifa in 2002 (17 killed). This macabre list is much longer. These people are now walking around free. They spent less than a decade in jail and they now get a nice salary from the Palestinian Authority.

The death penalty is often said to be immoral. But I fail to understand, for the life of me, what is moral about these people walking around free. Precisely because Israel has freed such terrorists in the past and will likely and unfortunately do so again in the future, the time has come to discuss the implementation of the death penalty in Israel.

In 1954 Israel passed a law restricting the death penalty to convicted perpetrators of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, crimes against the Jewish people, and high treason in time of war. The penalty was administered to the architect of Hitler's Final Solution, Adolph Eichmann, in 1962. Military tribunals in Israel can administer the death penalty, but military death sentences have always been commuted to imprisonment. In 2003, the prosecution sought death for the Palestinian "policeman" responsible for the lynch of 2 Israeli soldiers in Ramallah in October 2000. Only 2 of the 3 judges agreed, short of the unanimous verdict required by law. The author of the lynch was sent to jail, and since then the Israeli military prosecution has never asked for the death penalty - not even for the murderers of the Fogel family (a father, mother, and 3 young children, including a baby, murdered in their sleep on the 11th of March 2011). The murderer, Amjad Awad, is in jail. Like other murderers before him, he might be freed in a future swap of prisoners.

Because of the unfathomable cruelty of the murders, and because of Israel's immoral release of murderers, administering the death penalty in extreme cases such as the ones we just witnessed is actually the moral thing to do - whether the murderer is Arab or Jewish.

(source: Opinion; Emmanuel Navon chairs the political science and communication department at the Jerusalem Orthodox College, and teaches international relations at Tel-Aviv University and at the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center. He is a senior fellow at the Kohelet Policy Forum---- i24News)






IRAN:

411 Executions in the First Half of 2014


At least 411 prisoners have been executed in Iran from the beginning of January 2014 to the end of June of the same year. This indicates that the execution wave, which recommenced after the most recent Iranian presidential election, is continuing. According to reports by Iran Human Rights (IHR), more than 870 people have been executed since the election of Mr. Hassan Rouhani in June 2013. IHR calls on the international community to take serious measures to stop the execution wave in Iran.

1 year after the Iranian presidential election of June 2013, and despite improvements in relations between the international community and Iran, a recent report by Iran Human Rights (IHR) shows that the use of the death penalty is higher now than in 2 decades. According to the latest report by IHR, at least 411 people have been executed in the first 6 months of 2014, and at least 870 people have been executed during the 1st year after the presidential elections (between July 1, July 2013 and June 30, 2014). This is an average of more than 2 executions in Iran every day. Among those executed so far in 2014, there have been at least 8 juvenile offenders and 6 political and civil activists.

IHR calls on the international community to take serious measures to stop the execution wave in Iran. Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, the spokesperson of IHR says: "The increase in the number of executions after the Iranian presidential election of June 2013 is dramatic and needs special attention from the international community. We support Ms. Navi Pillay's call to include human rights in the nuclear talks taking place between the 5+1 and Iran." Amiry-Moghaddam added: "The arbitrary executions going on in Iran must have consequences for the Iranian authorities."

Last week the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay said: "Talks between Iran and 6 world powers aimed at clinching a deal on Iran's contested nuclear program should include human rights concerns."

In November 2013, World Coalition against the Death Penalty called on the UN and EU to put the death penalty on top of the agenda on Iran talks.

According to IHR's report on the death penalty, in the first half of this year 166 executions have been announced by official Iranian sources while 245 additional executions have been reported by human rights groups and confirmed by several independent sources. 43% of the executions in Iran are reportedly based on murder and 42% of the executions are reportedly due to drug-related charges. At least 8 of those executed in 2014 were juveniles (under 18 the age of 18) at the time of committing the alleged offence.

Last year at least 687 people were executed, according to IHR's 2013 annual report on the death penalty. 68% of these executions took place after the election of Hassan Rouhani.

(source: Iran Human Rights)

_______________________________________________
DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty

Search the Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/deathpenalty@lists.washlaw.edu/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A free service of WashLaw
http://washlaw.edu
(785)670.1088
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to