Oct. 7


KENYA:

Court hands 6 Kisumu fishermen death sentence for murder of 2 colleagues


6 fishermen charged with the murder of 2 of their colleagues have been sentenced to death by the Homa Bay High Court.

David Ongata Opiyo, William Ayugi, Tilleny Odhiambo,Silas Onyango Odongo, Peter Otieno and Tiberius Ododa Nyangero were found guilty of murdering Lameck Olima Ochieng and Felix Ouma Odhiambo on the night of August 16 and 17, 2010 at Dhogunda beach, Usao sub location in Suba district, Nyanza.

A 7th suspect, Paul Ochieng Oketch did not attend the court proceedings.

"After carefully evaluating the evidence from both sides, this court has no doubt in its mind that on the material night Opiyo, Ayugi, Odhiambo, Odongo and Onyango, with others not before the court, killed Lameck," Justice David Majanja said reading the ruling.

Majanja delivered the ruling as signed off by by Kisumu High Court Judge Lady Justice Esther Maina. The prosecution lined up 16 witnesses and submitted identification, recognition, malice aforethought and common intention before the court.

The prosecution argued that even though the incident took place at night all the eye witnesses testified that the torches the attackers had and moonlight exposed their faces.

A witness who was with the deceased escaped. He told the court that on the material day, the suspects approached them in two boats at around 2am demanding fish and money. He said they were armed with spears, pangas and stones.

When they declined, the accused pelted them with the stones but he dove into Lake Victoria for safety. The fisherman said he hid under the water hyacinth for 45 minutes and saw the accused leaving with the deceased.

He said the light enabled him to identify them as childhood friends. He later reported the matter to the families of the deceased and recorded a statement with the police.

The court also heard that the nature of the injuries inflicted on the deceased and the other evidence presented were clear proof that the accused had intentions to kill.

The accused requested a fair ruling saying they are their families' sole breadwinners and denied the charges against them.

"I have considered the statements made in mitigation, however the law of Kenya is clear, it describes only 1 penalty for the offense of murder which you have been convicted of, and that is the sentence of death," Majanja read.

"I therefore sentence Opiyo, Ayugi, Odhiambo, Odongo and Onyango accused to death for the murder of Lameck, but since the death sentence cannot be enforced twice, the sentence in respect to Felix is left in the abeyance," Majanja continued.

The 6th accused, Tiberius Obada was sentenced to death in respect to Odhiambo's murder. They accused have 14 days to appeal the ruling.

(source: The Star)






IRAN:

Iranian convicted in controversial murder case could escape execution


An Iranian woman facing a death sentence in a murder case that some have labeled a miscarriage of justice may be spared the gallows, Iranian judicial officials said.

Authorities were seeking consent from the family of the victim to vacate the capital judgment against Reyhaneh Jabbari, according to an Iranian judiciary spokesman, Gholam Hussein Mohseni Ezhei, who made the comments Monday at his weekly news conference.

Meanwhile, the semi-official Iranian Students News Agency quoted the nation's justice minister, Mustafa Pourmohammadi, as saying that the hanging of Jabbari would be put off for at least 40 days.

Observers said the comments likely meant that Iranian authorities had decided to commute the death sentence for Jabbari, whose case has been widely circulated on various social media forums. It was not clear if Jabbari could face more prison time if spared execution.

Fears that her execution was imminent were raised late last month when she was moved to another prison, but then quickly returned to her original lockup.

Jabbari was arrested in 2007 and sentenced to death in 2009 for the murder of Morteza Abdolali Sarbandi, a doctor and former Intelligence Ministry employee, according to a report by Human Rights Watch. The New York-based rights watchdog has called on Iranian authorities to cancel the execution.

The case against her is murky, defense lawyers say. Jabbari admitted stabbing Sarbandi in the neck, but said that he had attempted to assault her sexually, Human Rights Watch said. She also asserted that a "3rd person" may have been responsible for the death, according to Human Rights Watch.

Her lawyers have contended that the case was not properly investigated and that Jabbari did not receive a fair trial.

In April 2014, Human Rights Watch said, Iran's judiciary halted Jabbari's execution to review the conviction and death sentence.

Reached via cellphone, Jabbari's attorney, Parisa Ghanbari, said, "God willing, I will get a pardon from the victim's family and save her life."

A friend of Jabbari described the prisoner as "very depressed and hopeless."

In another controversial legal case in Iran, Yeganeh Salehi, a jailed Iranian journalist, has been released on bail, her family said Monday. She and her husband, Jason Rezaian, Tehran correspondent for the Washington Post, were arrested in July and had been held without formal charges.

Rezaian, who holds both Iranian and U.S. citizenship, remained in jail. Media freedom groups have called on Iranian authorities to release the couple and other journalists jailed in Iran.

(source: Los Angeles Times)






AFGHANISTAN:

Paghman rapists to be hanged to death on Wednesday


According to reports, the Paghman rape convicts will be hanged to death on Wednesday.

Sediq Sediq, spokesman for the Ministry of Interior (MoI) told reporters that the convicts will likely be executed tomorrow.

The former President Hamid Karzai signed off on the order for execution of 5 criminals convicted of rape & kidnapping in Paghman incident 2 days before the transfer of power to Dr. Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai.

The Appeals Court of Kabul awarded death sentence to 5 of the 7 convicts of a group involved in brutal beating, robbery and gang-rape of 4 women in capital Kabul.

The death penalty was approved by the Supreme Court of Afghanistan on 24th September.

The convicts facing death penalty includes Azizullah, Nazar Mohammad, Qaisullah, Samiullah and Habibullah, who were involved in gang rape of 4 women.

The women were initially abducted while they were returning from a wedding ceremony and were repeatedly raped besides their belongings were robbed by the gang.

(source: Khaama Press)

*******************

Delay Executions in Rape Case----Gravely Flawed Trial Adds to Injustice of Heinous Crime


The Paghman case demonstrates how far Afghanistan is from providing criminal suspects a fair trial. The mishandling of this case should spur President Ghani to impose an immediate moratorium on executions, at least until Afghanistan conducts trials that meet international standards.

President Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan should delay the execution of 5 men convicted in a badly flawed trial following the gang rape of 4 women in Paghman district, near Kabul, Human Rights Watch said today. The men, who were convicted of robbery and extramarital sex (zina), are scheduled to be executed on October 8, 2014.

President Ghani should order an independent review of the handling of the case by the government, including the police and the prosecutor???s office.

"President Ghani has called for a review of Afghan's justice system, but he has an immediate opportunity to stop a grave miscarriage of justice," said Phelim Kine, deputy Asia director. "The horrendous due process violations in the Paghman trial have only worsened the injustices of this terrible crime."

On August 23, a group of men in police uniforms, armed with assault rifles, stopped two cars in Paghman district outside Kabul, took money and jewelry from the passengers, and then raped 4 of the women passengers, 1 of whom was pregnant.

The case against the accused has been riddled with serious problems from the start, beginning with public statements from then-President Hamid Karzai's office urging speedy death sentences before the trial had taken place. Numerous due process violations - including a manipulated lineup for identification, allegations of coerced confessions, the provision of mere days for the defense to prepare its case, and a cursory trial that included no real presentation of evidence - severely undermined the suspects' rights to a fair trial and a hearing by an independent court.

The court seemed determined to hand down the death penalty in the case, applying a law allowing a death sentence even though the penalty does not appear to apply in the case. Very few crimes are eligible for capital punishment under Afghan law.

International human rights treaties to which Afghanistan is a party only allow the death penalty for the most serious crimes when there is scrupulous adherence to fair trial standards. This case fell far short of those international standards.

Human Rights Watch opposes the death penalty in all circumstances as an inherently cruel and irreversible punishment. A majority of countries have abolished the practice. On December 18, 2007, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution by a wide margin calling for a worldwide moratorium on executions.

The case also highlights the dangers for female victims of sexual violence, who already face severe social stigma in Afghanistan. In one example, police investigators allowed journalists to watch the four victims identify the alleged attackers in a lineup on September 3, putting the victims at risk in a manner that may deter future victims of sexual assault from coming forward.

"The Paghman case demonstrates how far Afghanistan is from providing criminal suspects a fair trial," Kine said. "The mishandling of this case should spur President Ghani to impose an immediate moratorium on executions, at least until Afghanistan conducts trials that meet international standards."

(source: Human Rights Watch)






THAILAND:

Thai police chief defends investigation of murder of British tourists


Thailand's police chief defended on Tuesday the arrest of 2 Myanmar men for the murder of 2 British tourists amid concern the pair may have admitted to the murders under duress.

The bodies of Hannah Witheridge, 23, and David Miller, 24, were found on a beach on the southern island of Koh Tao, a normally tranquil spot famous for its coral reefs and diving, last month.

Miller died from drowning and blows to the head, while Witheridge died from severe head wounds, examinations by Thailand's forensics department found.

The killings have dented Thailand's image as a happy-go-lucky holiday paradise and come after the tourism industry, which contributes almost 10 % of gross domestic product, was already battered by months of political protest, a May 22 coup and military rule.

Police were widely accused of bungling the investigation and pressure grew for them to solve it quickly.

Last week, police said 2 Myanmar workers had admitted to killing the tourists and that DNA found on Witheridge matched samples taken from the 2 men.

"I insist that all officials in this case have done a good job. A perfect job," national police chief General Somyot Poompanmuang told a news conference in Bangkok.

The suspects, who have been identified only as "Saw Rim" and "Win", both 21, have been charged with the murder of both Britons and the rape of Witheridge.

If found guilty, they could face the death penalty.

But a lawyer contracted by Myanmar's embassy in Thailand to defend the suspects said the case was a "set-up and not based on hard facts", according to the Democratic Voice of Burma, an independent Myanmar news organisation based in Norway.

"From what we have learned, there are inconsistencies with both the forensic report and evidence provided in the case," the lawyer, Aung Myo Thant, was quoted as saying.

He was not available for comment.

'NO ABUSE'

Police stressed the importance of their DNA evidence.

"DNA found on the deceased's body matches the suspects," said Police Major General Suwat Chaengyodsuk, the officer who led the investigation. "This is something that cannot be denied."

Police said a mobile phone belonging to Miller was also found on Saw. A 3rd Myanmar migrant worker is in police custody but has not been charged.

Some rights groups have voiced concern over accusations of abuse during the investigation.

"A number of serious allegations of physical abuse against Myanmar workers as part of the questioning process in this murder case have been raised to us," said Andy Hall, a rights activist and researcher based in Thailand.

"The accusations do not concern the two or three persons currently detained for the murder. We do not have enough evidence or information at this stage to comment on how or if the two accused have been scapegoated for this crime or not."

Migrant workers often face discrimination in Thailand and have been used as scapegoats for crimes before. But police denied using force during their interrogation.

"I confirm that there was no abuse of any of the suspects," said lead investigator Suwat.

The case will be forwarded to a court on Oct. 14.

(source: Reuters)






SOUTH KOREA:

South Korea ferry captain admits he let passengers down


The ship's captain at the heart of South Korea's ferry disaster acknowledged during his murder trial Tuesday that he should have done more to get passengers to safety as the boat started sinking.

Testifying for the 1st time in court, Lee Joon-Seok said his decision-making process was paralysed by the shock of the incident, but insisted that he had never intended to sacrifice the lives of the passengers to save himself.

The 6,825-tonne Sewol capsized and sank on April 16, with the loss of more than 300 lives - most of them school pupils.

The captain and crew were vilified for abandoning the ferry while hundreds were still trapped inside, and criticised for ordering passengers to remain where they were when the ship began listing.

"I was stunned by the accident and I lost my ability to make decisions," a visibly shaken Lee told the court in the southwestern city of Gwangju.

"I failed to take the necessary measures for passengers to leave the ship.

"(But) I swear I never thought passengers should be left to die in order for me to make it to safety first," he said.

The bespectacled Lee, dressed in a khaki prison uniform with the number 3114, appeared tense and stammered during his testimony.

The 69-year-old and 3 senior crew members are accused of "homicide through wilful negligence" - a charge that can carry the death penalty.

11 other crew are being tried on lesser violations of maritime law.

The findings released Monday of a 5-month investigation by state prosecutors, concluded that a deadly combination of cargo overloading, illegal redesign and poor helmsmanship had caused the disaster.

Under questioning by prosecutors in court, Lee said he knew that crew member Cho Jun-Ki, who was steering the ship after working the Sewol for only 6 months, did not have the required skill and experience.

Lee, when asked if he should have taken the helm as the ship entered a channel notorious for its strong underwater currents, replied: "Yes, I guess so."

The Sewol, which was overloaded and top-heavy following an illegal refit, made a sharp turn in the channel, causing it to list sharply to one side.

This caused the cargo to shift, and the ferry was unable to right itself, eventually turning full turtle and sinking.

Asked where he was when the ferry ran into trouble, Lee said he was in his cabin "smoking and changing clothes".

He denied allegations by some crew members that he had been playing games on his mobile phone.

"No, I wasn't playing a game. I wouldn't know how to. I was just holding the smartphone," he said.

Lee has insisted that the ferry owners are the real culprits as it was their decision to habitually overload the vessel.

(source: Zee News)



NIGERIA:

HURIWA Endorses Court Martial, Restates Demand for Probe of Defence Budgets


Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), a pro-democracy non-governmental organisation, has thrown its weight behind the just-concluded court marshal, which tried and convicted some indicted military operatives for acts of indiscipline and other offences, and the recently inaugurated second court marshal by the Nigerian military authority.

Besides, the rights group has further called on the federal government and the Nigerian National Assembly to initiate a transparent, open, accountable and comprehensive investigation of the opaque procurement processes in the Nigerian Defence and police sectors since the advent of civil rule in 1999 to ascertain how the state of combat readiness and the equipping of the nation's military and police deteriorated to such a sorry state that the country is finding it cumbersome to confront and defeat the armed Islamic terrorists (Boko Haram), who have waged a war of attrition against Nigeria since 2009.

In a statement signed jointly by the National Coordinator, Comrade Emmanuel Onwubiko and the National Media Affairs Director, Miss. Zainab Yusuf, HURIWA said it was imperative that whilst the Nigerian system struggles to re-establish a strict disciplinary regime among the ranks and file of the Nigerian Armed Forces as it battles the bloody insurgency and terrorism in the North-eastern segment of Nigeria, it is equally germane that the country deliberately open a fearless probe of the remote and immediate circumstances surrounding the deep seated decline that have afflicted our military and how the once feared military organisation in the world has suddenly found it almost a huge task to defeat the seemingly ragtag Islamic terrorists that have threatened the corporate existence of Nigeria.

HURIWA also cautioned Nigerians, who have rushed to condemn the recently passed verdict of the military court in Abuja, which tried and convicted over one dozen junior ranks for offences ranging from mutiny, cowardly conduct and attempted murder of a senior military commander because in the thinking of the group, the groundswell of impulsive condemnation of the military judicial system, which is grounded in the constitution of Nigeria is tantamount to justifying rascally and atrocious acts of criminal indiscipline, which are alien not only to the Nigerian military tradition but to the military as a unique institution around the world.

The group similarly carpeted the Amnesty International and the Human Rights Watch of the United Kingdom and the United States of America for condemning the General Court Marshal in Nigeria by the military authority and challenged these groups to show Nigerians why acts of indiscipline by military operatives should be tolerated.

"Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch should stop crying more than the bereaved and allow the legal and constitutionally permitted mechanisms in the Nigerian military to take its full course," it said. "Although we may not completely be in agreement with the complete judicial decision of the Court marshal, which turned in death penalty on some indicted military operatives, we are not against any legal process supported by the 1999 constitution, which are meant to infuse strict discipline amongst the members of the Nigerian military.

"We advocate lesser punishment but certainly we are not ready to board the impulsive bandwagon of groups opposing any disciplinary moves to restructure and reposition the Nigerian military to assume its rightful position as the professionally competent and effective defenders of the territorial integrity of Nigeria.

"Nigerians must be conscious not to jump into irrational condemnation of the military hierarchy for doing what is right and just. We hereby also advocate immediate and comprehensive investigation of all the expenditures invested in the procurement of military soft and hardware since 1999 to determine what happened to the humongous amount of money said to have been released to the Defence and Police sectors.

"We propose the death penalty for convicted thieves [especially military Generals and top police ministry officials] of defence and police budgets of Nigeria for these persons are the worst saboteurs of the corporate entity called Nigeria," HURIWA stated.

(source: This Day)






INDONESIA:

Bali murder took place after victim used racial slur----Indonesian police say Tommy Schaefer struck Sheila von Wiese Mack after she called him the 'n-word'


According to an Associated Press report this weekend, Indonesian police said a former Oak Park woman who was found beaten to death and stuffed into a suitcase at a Bali resort in August was killed after she taunted her daughter's boyfriend with a racial slur.

Heather Mack, 19, reportedly told police her boyfriend, Tommy Schaefer, 21, became angry after Sheila von Wiese Mack, 62, called him the "n-word." She said Schaefer struck her mother with a metal plant stand from the hotel.

According to AP, Mack's lawyers said Mack did not confirm whether she witnessed the murder.

"Our client did not mention [whether] the beating was intended to kill her mother or not. She just confessed to the police that Tommy beat her mother," Mack's Indonesian lawyer, Raja Nasution, said.

Nasution also said Mack did not kill von Wiese-Mack or help stuff her body into the suitcase.

Tommy Schaefer's mother, Forest Park resident Kia Walker, is working with the UK-based international anti-death penalty group Reprieve to get a lawyer for her son in Indonesia. Wednesday Journal attempted to contact Reprieve in both the U.K. and U.S. but received no response by Monday morning.

Reprieve helped secure the legal help of Haposan Sihombing, an Indonesian lawyer, but Sihombing had to withdraw because of a potential conflict of interest, said Chicago lawyer Thomas Durkin, who said he is helping the family by working as Schaefer's U.S. attorney.

Durkin said he did not have expertise in the Indonesian legal system, which was unlike the American or British system.

"It's a very difficult situation and I'm doing these people a favor," he said.

Schaefer is African-American, as was James Mack, the husband of the victim. James Mack was a renowned composer and jazz performer who died in 2006.

The AP reported that, according to Indonesian police, during the argument Schaefer pointed out that von Wiese Mack's husband was black, and she allegedly replied that he was also rich.

Reportedly, Indonesian police said a surveillance video in the St. Regis Hotel shows Schaefer entering von Wiese Mack's room with the plant stand concealed under his shirt. Bits of iron matching the plant stand were found in the victim's wounds, Indonesian police said.

Later video from the corridor showed Mack bringing a cart to move the suitcase holding von Wiese Mack's body and Schaefer carrying the suitcase to the cart. The 2 abandoned the suitcase in a taxi and escaped through the hotel's back door. They were arrested the next day at a different hotel near the airport.

Kia Walker's website asking for donations to help pay her son's legal fees has reached $10,600. In an update, Walker said she had been advised not to comment publicly on the reports from Indonesia.

"I spent the weekend practicing self-care," she said on the website.

"So far, $200 has been spent for Tommy's food expenses and phone privileges. I plan to visit him after charges have been brought. I've accomplished a great deal by staying home and being surrounded by my friends and chosen family," she wrote. "Along with the support of the fund, I am hoping my son receives a fair trial."

(source: Forest Park Review)



_______________________________________________
DeathPenalty mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty

Search the Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A free service of WashLaw
http://washlaw.edu
(785)670.1088
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to