July 29


IRAN----executions

Iranian Authorities Hang 14 Prisoners to Death, 3 of the Executions Carried Out in Public----In the past 1 days Iranian authorities have reportedly hanged 14 prisoners to death, 3 of the executions were carried out in public.


Based on official and unofficial reports, Iranian authorities have executed at least 14 prisoners in the province of Alborz since Monday.

Close sources say seven prisoners with drug charges were hanged to death on Monday in Karaj Central Prison. On Saturday the Iranian authorities had reportedly transferred the 7 prisoners along with 2 more prisoners to solitary confinement. The executions of the 2 others prisoners have reportedly been delayed for unknown reasons.

On Tuesday 4 prisoners at Ghezel Hesar Prison were hanged to death for drug charges, according to close sources. The prisoners were reportedly removed out of their prison wards on Sunday and transferred to solitary confinement along with 2 more prisoners. The executions of the 2 other prisoners have reportedly been delayed for unknown reasons.

Today Iranian authorities hanged 3 prisoners to death in a public area in the city of Karaj, reports state media Mehr News. The report does not mention the names of the prisoners or their charges.

(source: Iran Human Rights)

****************

UN drugs deal with Iran is sending people to the gallows.


Jannat Mir was in the 9th grade when he left Afghanistan for Iran. Like many who journey across the border, he was probably looking for more opportunity in the comparatively more stable neighbouring country. But instead, on the 18th April 2014, 15- year- old Jannat was hanged in Dastgerd prison in the city of Isfahan, Iran.

He had been arrested by the Iranian authorities and sentenced to death for allegedly moving heroin across the border. Jannat didn't have access to a lawyer and, after his death; the Iranian authorities reportedly did not allow the family to take the body back to Afghanistan.

A month before Jannat was executed, Yuri Fedotov, the Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), applauded the Iranians' effort to combat drug trafficking. "Iran takes a very active role to fight against illicit drugs Fedotov told reporters. "It is very impressive." While Janat was in custody, UNODC was co-funding a $5.4m project that provided support for Iran's war on drugs.

Many have lost their lives to this war. So far this year, the Iranian authorities are believed to have executed an equivalent of more than 3 people per day; 80% of those awaiting execution are convicted of drug-related offences, according to the Iranian authorities. UNODC is now reportedly about to finalise a new multimillion-dollar funding package for Iran's counter-narcotics trafficking programmes, despite the country's high execution rate of drug offenders.

The new 5- year deal will be funded with money from some European donors. The UK, Denmark and Ireland have stopped funding the Iranian campaign due to the human rights concerns. However, according to the organisation Reprieve, France and Norway continue to give money.

The news of the deal comes at a time when Amnesty International called Iran out for its "staggering execution spree". Last week, the group released a statement noting that the Iranian authorities are believed to have executed an astonishing 694 people between 1 January and 15 July 2015; an unprecedented spike in executions. Amnesty pointed to Iran's Anti-Narcotics Law as a possible explanation of the spike. The law provides mandatory death sentences for a range of drug-related offences, including trafficking more than 5kg of narcotics derived from opium or more than 30g of heroin, morphine, cocaine or their chemical derivatives.

Under article 6(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Iran has ratified, the death penalty may be applied only to the "most serious crimes". The UN Human Rights Committee has said that drug offences do not constitute "most serious crimes", and that use of the death penalty for drug offences violates international law. According to figures obtained from Iran Human Rights Documentation Centre (IHRDC), in one week in June this year, 47 people were allegedly hanged for the crime of drug trafficking, although most were not "officially" recognised.

The death penalty sentences are handed down by a flawed legal system, notes Rod Sanjabi, Executive Director of IHRDC. "There's typically no appeal, no right to appeal," he says. "The trial court judgement is final and that's even in death penalty cases, which is quite starkly in violation of domestic law, let along international obligations." The standard of evidence is typically not very high, he adds, noting there is reliance in the Iranian legal system on confessions: "The arrest will be followed by some lengthy period, sometimes days, sometimes weeks, sometimes months, of pre-trial detention where the defendant is in held incommunicado for periods of time, kept in solitary confinement, usually denied legal counsel... they'll be held for this long pre-trial period, specifically with the aim of extracting a confession from them."

Human rights organisations have campaigned for the UN to freeze the funding of Iran's anti-narcotic efforts on account of this. In December 2014, six organisations; Reprieve, Human Rights Watch, Iran Human Rights, the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty, Harm Reduction International and the Abdorrahman Boroumand Foundation called on UNODC to follow its own human rights guidance, which explicitly stated that UNODC actions should take every opportunity to further the realization of human rights.

They described the agency's decision to continue funding supply-side counter-narcotics efforts in the country as "ineffective if not counterproductive." This point was reiterated in the Amnesty International press release. Earlier this year, the deputy of Iran's Centre for Strategic Research admitted that the death penalty has not been able to reduce drug trafficking levels.

What would be more effective argues Sanjabi, is to tackle the underlying issues pushing people towards drug trafficking. "There are, in the border areas especially, a widespread lack of opportunity for youth, educated or uneducated," he said. "It is probably far more effective for the state to focus on creating those opportunities and far more constructive as well, rather than to simply continue to deal with the drug trafficking problem in a reactive manner."

Reprieve spoke to Memo about the deal. Maya Foa, Director of Reprieve's death penalty team, said: "Iran has hanged hundreds of alleged drug offenders this year, but the UNODC still refuses to come clean about its generous new funding deal for Iranian drug police.

"It is an untenable hypocrisy for European nations like France and Germany to claim they oppose capital punishment "in all circumstances" while funding raids which send drug mules to death row. If these states' commitments on the death penalty are to count for anything, they should impose effective and transparent conditions to ensure their aid does not lead to executions", she added.

As UNODC looks set to provide millions of dollars to Iran for its counter-narcotics efforts, the spike in executions will no doubt continue to rise. And the UN will continue to have blood on its hands.

(source: Jessica Purkiss, Middle East Monitor)






BANGLADESH:

Bangladesh apex court upholds top BNP leader's death penalty


The panel, led by Chief Justice Surendra Kumar Sinha, upheld the death sentence of the 66-year-old leader of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) for involvement in the killing of a herbal medicine company owner Nutan Chandra Singha, Awami League leader Mozaffar Ahmed and his son, and 2 incidents of genocide in the country's southeastern region in Raozan, Chittagong, the Daily Star newspaper reported.

On 1 October, 2013, the worldwide Crimes Tribunal-1 found the BNP leader guilty of crimes against humanity during the War of Liberation and condemned him to death.

But defence lawyer Khandaker Mahbub Hossain said Chowdhury's legal team was disappointed and would seek a review of the judgement at the same court.

"The verdict has fulfilled our expectations", said Attorney general Mahbubey Alam.

A Bangladeshi activist celebrates after the Supreme Court cleared the way for the execution of opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party leader Salauddin Quader Chowdhury, convicted of war crimes in Dhaka, Bangladesh, Wednesday, July 29, 2015.

Salahuddin Chowdhury, leader of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, was acquitted of 1 charge, but the Supreme Court upheld the rest of the convictions.

Security has been beefed up in places in Dhaka and Chittagong, some 242 km southeast of the capital city.

SQ Chowdhury was charged for committing crimes against humanity by the war tribunal. He was, however, acquittal over the killing of Satish Chandra Palit in Raozan, for which the tribunal had sentenced him to 20 years in jail. His father was also a former speaker of Pakistan and served as an acting president several times.

Later, he joined BNP and was elected to parliament on its tickets.

He is the 2nd former minister to have the death sentence upheld after Jamaat-e-Islami's Ali Ahsan Muhammad Mujahid and the 5th to get a verdict on the appeal against the tribunal's judgment.

After the partition of India in 1947 and until 1971, Bangladesh was known as East Pakistan.

Another Jamaat leader Abdul Quader Molla, convicted of war crimes in 1971, was executed on December. 12, 2013.

After returning to power in January 2009, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the daughter of Bangladesh's independence hero Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, established the 1st tribunal in March 2010, nearly 40 years after the 1971 fight for independence from Pakistan.

(source: lidtime.com)






INDIA:

Rajiv Gandhi Killers Will Not Hang, Confirms Supreme Court


The Supreme Court today confirmed its decision of commuting the death sentence to life imprisonment of three persons convicted of killing former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi.

The apex Court dismissed the curative petition filed by the Centre which was seeking a review of the decision in February last year.

Centre's curative petition said that the victims in the former Prime Minister's assassination case were not heard before commuting their death sentence.

In February last year, the Court had commuted the death sentence of 3 persons - Santhan, Murugan and Perarivalan, citing the 11-year delay in deciding their mercy petitions.

The 3 convicts are lodged in a Vellore prison. Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated on May 21, 1991 in Sriperumbudur, Tamil Nadu.

(source: ndtv)

***************

India should say no to death penalty, says CPI's D Raja


Reiterating his party's opposition to capital punishment, Communist Party of India (CPI) leader D. Raja on Wednesday said India should say no to the death penalty.

"We continue to hold our position, we oppose capital punishment. India should say no to capital punishment," Raja told ANI.

"In this regard I am moving a private member resolution in the Rajya Sabha, its listed for 31st July. Till the Government and Parliament decide upon death penalty statute, India should have a moratorium of death sentences," he added.

The Supreme Court earlier rejected 1993 Mumbai balsts convict Yakub Memon's petition on his death warrant, paving the way for his execution tomorrow.

He is expected to be hanged inside the Nagpur jail at 7 a.m. tomorrow.

The apex court had earlier dismissed the curative petition of Yakub. A 3-judge bench comprising Justices Dipak Misra, Prafulla C. Pant and Amitava Roy said proper procedure was followed in disposing of Yakub's curative petition.

(source: ANI news)



PAKISTAN:

Pakistan Must Release Asia Bibi To Demonstrate Protection For Its Religious Minorities - Analysis


Pakistan's Supreme Court took an encouraging step forward last week when it decided to reconsider blasphemy charges against Pakistani Christian woman, Asia Bibi, who is facing a death sentence. This decision provides an opportunity for Pakistan to acquit Bibi and show the world its commitment to protecting its religious minorities. The U.S. must prioritize the issue of religious freedom in its dialogue with Pakistan to discourage any further persecution of religious minorities and to undercut support for Islamist extremist ideologies that leads to targeted violence against these vulnerable communities.

Bibi, a mother of 5 and a farmworker, was arrested in 2009 after her Muslim co-workers alleged that she had committed blasphemy during an argument about sharing the same water bowl. In November 2010, she was sentenced to death by a Pakistani trial court, a decision that was upheld by the Lahore High Court in October 2014.

Growing Intolerance

Under Pakistani law, blasphemous acts include making derogatory remarks against the Muslim prophet Muhammed and defiling the Koran. Allegations of blasphemy are often fabricated and are commonly used to intimidate religious minorities or settle personal vendettas, including against fellow Muslims. Moreover, blasphemy charges do not require proof of intent or evidence, and there are no penalties for false allegations. Since the laws do not provide details on what constitutes a violation, accusers have broad leeway to define what they deem an offense. In 2013, 38 individuals were imprisoned in Pakistan on blasphemy charges.

Pakistanis who have sought changes to the blasphemy laws or who have defended those wrongly accused have often been killed, demonstrating the rise in religious intolerance and support for extremist ideologies there. In early 2011, Pakistan's Governor of the Punjab Salman Taseer and Minority Affairs Minister Shahbaz Bhatti were assassinated by religious extremists because of their efforts to defend Bibi and roll back the controversial blasphemy laws. Human rights lawyer Rashid Rehman was assassinated in June 2014 for defending an English professor, Junaid Hafeez, who was accused of blasphemy. Rehman had received several death threats in the weeks prior to his assassination, but the Pakistani government failed to provide him with protection.

Former Pakistan People's Party parliamentarian and Pakistani Ambassador to the U.S., Sherry Rehman, introduced a bill in parliament in late 2010 to amend the blasphemy laws, but she was later forced to withdraw it under political pressure. Ambassador Rehman continues to face threats from extremists due to her support for re-examining the legislation and removing the death penalty as punishment. In January 2013, the Supreme Court of Pakistan approved admission of a blasphemy case filed against Ambassador Rehman for remarks she made on a television program in November 2010. The growing influence of extremist ideologies are endangering Pakistan's minority communities and jeopardizing the country's democratic institutions and values, including freedom of religion and speech.

The miscarriage of justice against Bibi is just the latest example of declining religious freedom in Pakistan. The U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom's 2015 Annual Report calls on the State Department to designate Pakistan as a country of particularly concern (CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA) - something it has called for since 2002.[1] 95 % of Pakistan's population is Muslim, including a 20 % Shia minority, which increasingly faces brutal attacks by Sunni extremists. Ahmadis (about 2 % of the Pakistani population), who consider themselves Muslim but are not recognized as such under Pakistani law, also face discriminatory legislation that prohibits them from calling themselves Muslims or their places of worship mosques, performing the Muslim call to prayer, using the traditional Islamic greeting in public, or publicly quoting from the Koran.

Bibi's case is a particularly pernicious example of the negative effects of blasphemy laws. Bibi's family has been forced to go into hiding, and Muslim clerics placed a $5,000 bounty on her head.[2] Bibi also faces extreme health challenges, including intestinal bleeding, that could be life-threatening.[3] If the Supreme Court rules in favor of Bibi, the court would overturn the decision by the Lahore High Court to sentence Bibi to death. If Bibi were released from jail, her life would still be in grave danger from vigilantes who could decide to take the law into their own hands. In April 2012, a Pakistani man accused of blasphemy was shot dead by religious zealots after he was acquitted and released from prison.

The U.S. Must Prioritize Religious Freedom in Pakistan

The growing pattern of religious intolerance and persecution of religious minorities in Pakistan is threatening the very fabric of Pakistani society and undermining democracy, not to mention putting the lives of millions of members of religious minorities in danger. The U.S. must make the protection of Pakistan's religious minorities a central plank of its dialogue with the country. More specifically, the U.S. should:

--Publicly advocate for the release of Asia Bibi. While the Pakistani Supreme Court has taken a step in the right direction with its decision to review Bibi's appeal, the U.S. must keep up the pressure for her immediate release from jail and help ensure that she receives proper medical care.

--Announce that unless Pakistan makes substantive changes to its blasphemy laws and how they are implemented, it will be designated a "Country of Particular Concern" under the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA). The IRFA was passed in 1998 and requires the U.S. Secretary of State to designate annually "countries of particular concern" and to take specific action aimed at improving religious freedom in those countries. A CPC is defined as a country in which the government either engages in or tolerates severe violations of religious freedom.

--Urge Pakistan to review all blasphemy cases. In 2014, the Pakistani courts conducted a review of blasphemy cases but did not include in the review any cases against members of religious minority groups.[4]

--Encourage Pakistan to implement steps called for by the Pakistani Supreme Court in 2014, including creating a special police force to protect religious minorities and elevating the work of the religious minority commission. The U.S. should structure its aid programs to support these activities through technical assistance, training, and exchanges.

--Support increased civil society engagement between Americans and Pakistanis to help elevate the voices of moderation and tolerance in Pakistan. There are plenty of Pakistani citizens who are working hard and, indeed, risking their lives to reverse extremist trends and ensure the rights and freedoms of all Pakistanis. U.S. - Pakistan government-to-government interactions alone will not get the job done. There is a need for more and deeper civil society engagement between our 2 countries that can help mobilize grassroots support for preserving religious freedom.

Reviving Pakistan's Founding Vision

Pakistan's founding father, Muhammed Ali Jinnah, supported the idea of Islam serving as a unifying force and believed Pakistanis had a responsibility to uphold the principles of religious freedom and to protect the rights of religious minorities. Releasing Asia Bibi from jail would be a good first step in reviving the country's founding ideals of religious tolerance.

(source: About the authors: Lisa Curtis is Senior Research Fellow for South Asia in the Asian Studies Center, of the Kathryn and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National Security and Foreign Policy, at The Heritage Foundation. Olivia Enos is a Research Associate in the Asian Studies Center---- eurasiareview.com)






SAUDI ARABIA----execution

Saudi executed for smuggling hashish


Saudi Arabia executed one of its citizens for drug trafficking on Tuesday. Saif Al-Hadissane was found guilty of smuggling a large amount of hashish and was executed in the Al-Ahsa region of eastern Saudi Arabia, the Interior Ministry said in a statement carried by the Saudi Press Agency.

The Interior Ministry has cited deterrence as a reason for carrying out the death penalty because of the physical and social harm caused by drugs. Under the Saudi law, drug trafficking, rape, murder and armed robbery are punishable by death.

(source: The Saudi Gazette)


SUDAN:

Sudanese pastors facing execution make final plea for justice; verdict set on Aug. 5


The lawyers representing the 2 South Sudanese pastors facing the death penalty made their closing arguments on July 23 in Khartoum before a judge who, sources said, appeared to be favouring the prosecution, according to Christian News.

A verdict is expected at a hearing on Aug. 5.

Speaking before the judge at the Khartoum Bari Court, the defence lawyers of Yat Michael and Peter Yein Reith maintained that agents of the National Intelligence and Security Services (NISS) illegally apprehended 49-year-old Michael on Dec. 14 last year and 36-year-old Reith on Jan. 11.

"Justice requires that you don't judge [arrest] simply because you doubt [suspect] them without any concrete evidence," one of the lawyers said.

Michael was arrested by authorities after he delivered a message of encouragement to a North Khartoum church amid a looming state-aided takeover of the congregation's property.

Reith was taken by security agents after he submitted a letter from the leaders of the South Sudan Presbyterian Evangelical Church which requested for information on the whereabouts of Michael.

A national intelligence agent accused the 2 of gathering information for a human rights group.

However, the charges, which include espionage and promotion of hatred against or among sects, were created months after their arrest.

Spying under the Sudanese Penal Code is punishable by death while inciting hatred is punishable by up to 2 years in jail.

"The judge in the last hearing seemed to be supporting the prosecution," said the source who asked not to be named. "The whole issue is politically motivated, and the 2 pastors are innocent, but the lawyers asked the judge to respect laws and the constitution and not aid NISS in violation of the Constitution."

The pastors are also accused of undermining the constitutional system - which is punishable by death - life imprisonment, and confiscation of property.

Disclosure and obtaining information and official documents is punishable by a year in prison while blasphemy or insulting religious creeds is punishable also by a year in jail or a fine or a maximum of 40 lashes.

The national intelligence agency used as evidence maps and easily accessible documents said to have been taken from the pastors' confiscated laptops.

A NISS study guide, which the pastors said was not in their computers before their arrest, was also presented as evidence.

The persecution of Christians intensified in Sudan following the secession of South Sudan in July 2011. President Omar al-Bashir is pushing for the country's adoption of a stricter version of sharia law and for the recognition of Islamic culture and the Arabic language only.

Since 2012, Sudan has kicked out foreign Christians and razed church buildings on the claim that they belonged to South Sudanese. Sudanese authorities have also been raiding Christian bookstores and arresting Christians, with some state agents even threatening to kill South Sudanese Christians who do not leave or cooperate with them in their effort to get rid of Christians.

Sudan ranked 6th on Christian support organisation Open Doors' 2015 World Watch List of 50 countries where Christians face persecution, moving up from 11th place from the previous year.

(source: Christian Today)






CHINA:

Colombian model who has her own TV show faces death penalty in China for carrying drugs 'inside her laptop'

A 22-year-old Colombian model is facing the death penalty after she was caught with a plastic bag full of drugs hidden inside her laptop.

Juliana Lopez seemed to have the world at her feet, running a trendy boutique and hosting a television show, as well as being a well-known professional football player.

And winning the Miss Antioquia beauty pageant, she was going to participate in the Miss World Medellin competition this week but her family suddenly lost contact with her while she was in China to purchase items for her shop.

Worried about her whereabouts, her family contacted the Colombian embassy saying that she had vanished. She had apparently flown into the airport in the city of Guangzhou, in the southeast Chinese province of Canton, after which they lost contact with her.

Chinese officials confirmed to the family she had been arrested for drug smuggling. It was not specified what kind of narcotics were inside her laptop but police say they found a large quantity of a banned substance.

Lopez plays for the women's team Divas del Futbol in Medellin. She is also a student at the University of San Buenaventura, in the city of Bello, in the north central Colombian district of Antioquia.

Carrying drugs in China is not only banned, but can carry the death penalty and relatives and friends are now desperately trying to collect money to get top lawyers and a team sent over to defend Lopez. They also want family and friends to travel over to support her.

The smiling profile picture of the model's Facebook page was taken on her first visit to China last year, and she has since been back to buy goods for her business.

Alejandro Duque is the coach of Divas del Futbol. He said: 'Juliana was the central point of the group, she spoke a lot with the press and she gave her face to the team.'

About the drug charges he added: 'She is a good girl, student, model, contestant of beauty contests, and she has always been an athlete.'

He said he had last seen her 2 weeks ago shortly before she travelled to China to buy shoes, clothes and other accessories.

Duque said: 'My heart tells me that she is not guilty, she is a fighter. She cannot be sentenced yet, I have hope that she is innocent and that everything can be sorted out.'

According to the newspaper El Tiempo, the Colombian Foreign Ministry has provided legal assistance and support to Lopez and her family through her mother, Nubia Sarrazola.

A spokesman for the ministry said: 'We work to ensure the preservation of the rights of private individuals and the right to a proper defence and the presumption of innocence, as well as respect for due process and the preservation of her personal integrity and her health.'

But the Chinese police investigation could take between 6 months and 2 years and the amount of contact the model will be allowed with her family is likely to be limited.

Currently, there are 138 Colombian prisoners in China's jails for a range of offences and 12 of them have been sentenced to death. 9 of these cases have been frozen thanks to the efforts of the Colombian government. Another group of 11 has been sentenced to life imprisonment.

Of those detained, 90 % were linked with drugs-related crimes and the rest were related to prostitution.

China executes the highest number of people of any country annually and is believed to put to death more than the rest of the world put together, according to Amnesty International.

(source: Daily Mail)


_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to