Aug. 27



OHIO:

Man accused of quadruple homicide could face death penalty if convicted


Robert L. Adams Jr. could face the death penalty if he is convicted of killing 4 people in the basement of a South Linden house on June 13.

A Franklin County grand jury indicted Adams on 29 counts relating to the deaths and the attempted murder of a 5th victim.

Adams is accused of killing Tyajah Nelson, 18; Daniel Sharp, 26; Angela Harrison, 35; and Michael Ballour, 41. A 5th victim, a teenage girl, survived the shooting and identified Adams and an accomplice, according to court records.

The shootings occurred in Ballour's house in the 1600 block of E. Hudson Street. Nelson was his daughter.

Police said Adams was the shooter but was assisted by Jordyn D. Wade, 16. Wade is charged with 4 delinquency counts of murder, 1 delinquency count of attempted murder and 5 delinquency counts of kidnapping.

He is being held in the Franklin County Juvenile Detention Center awaiting a hearing in Juvenile Court to determine whether his case will be transferred to adult court.

Wade is accused of holding the victims at gunpoint to keep them in the basement, where they were shot by Adams, police said. Investigators said the victims were robbed, and the killings were drug-related, although officials have not elaborated.

Adams was arrested near Starkville, Miss., on Aug. 12. He will be arraigned on Monday in Franklin County Common Pleas Court.

(source: Columbus Dispatch)






MISSOURI----impending execution

Doubting Jennifer Herndon ---- An appeals lawyer who has represented more than a half-dozen men put to death in Missouri faces questions about her competency.


In 6 days, on Sept. 1, Missouri is scheduled to execute 50-year-old Roderick Nunley, who was condemned for the 1989 rape and murder of 15-year-old Ann Harrison. The high school freshman was abducted while in her driveway, waiting for the school bus.

If the execution takes place, one of Nunley's attorneys, Jennifer Herndon, will have represented 8 of the last 19 men executed in Missouri. And those 8 men will have been executed in a span of 4 1/2 years.

The Marshall Project profiled Herndon in June, describing how she juggles a debilitating workload as a capital appeals attorney with a separate career as an internet marketer, sending out inspirational messages along with product pitches geared for online entrepreneurs. The story also detailed Herndon???s financial and professional struggles; in 2013, her law license was suspended for 4 months because of delinquent state income taxes.

On Tuesday, 2 other attorneys who once assisted in Nunley's case filed a motion with the Missouri Supreme Court, asking that Nunley's execution warrant be recalled because of "severe doubts??? about Herndon's fitness as a lawyer. Their motion cited The Marshall Project's story, in which Herndon said, among other things, "I feel like I'm not doing the best work I can or should be doing for my clients right now."

With Herndon, the quantity of her legal work was already an issue. Because relatively few attorneys handle capital appeals in Missouri, the state's accelerated pace of executions in recent years has created unusual stress for the defense bar. Of the 19 executions held nationally this year, Missouri has 5, 2nd only to Texas.

But the motion went as much to the quality of Herndon's work, and whether she has met her ethical obligations as an attorney.

In years past, the Missouri Department of Revenue filed three liens against Herndon, saying she owed more than $47,000 for unpaid state income taxes from 2006 to 2012, according to court records. But two months ago, the department filed a fourth lien, saying Herndon owes $2,077.85 for unpaid taxes in 2013 - a delinquency that could once again place her law license in jeopardy.

The motion filed by the 2 other attorneys said "equally troubling" was a lawsuit filed against Herndon last month. That suit, an unlawful detainer action, alleges that Herndon's house was purchased on July 14 in a foreclosure sale, but Herndon has failed to leave the residence.

"Ms. Herndon appears to lack the time and capacity to competently represent Mr. Nunley," the motion says. "Her online career and pending legal and financial problems raise substantial questions about her competence."

In an email sent to The Marshall Project, Herndon wrote of how the court system has placed her in the unfair position of handling "a never-ending string of back-to-back executions," while simultaneously refusing to approve additional funds.

"I have rejected opportunities to make money in my other business, opting instead to work on Mr. Nunley's case because his life matters more than money to me. I have laid out money from my own pocket, in excess of $300 to date, to cover copy costs, postage and filing fees. I will not be reimbursed for this, but can't take that into consideration when his life is at stake.

"I am doing everything I can for Roderick. Is it enough? No. Do I think I could save his life if I had all the resources in the world? Not without a miracle. Over the last 2 years, just considering my clients, I have seen the state execute 2 men who were incompetent, 1 who was mentally ill, 1 who was mentally retarded, and 1 who made such a transformation in prison that he would have made a fine next door neighbor. I have filed motions supported by case law the state couldn't refute, hired experts whose opinions were uncontroverted, drafted clemency petitions the size of a book, and yet Missouri continues to execute men, no matter how legally or morally wrong it is under the specifics of each case. That's why I want out. Not because I don't care anymore, but because the system is broken here. I can't fix it, and being a part of it makes me feel like an enabler of the executioner."

The motion filed Tuesday included affidavits from Lindsay Runnels and Jennifer Merrigan, the two attorneys who once assisted in the case, and from Shynise Nunley Spencer, who is Nunley's daughter. Runnels, in her affidavit, said that in the summer of 2010, she agreed to help the defense team search for evidence in Nunley's past that might mitigate the crime, such as childhood trauma or mental illness. But because of Herndon, Runnels wrote, she encountered obstacles with such basic steps as obtaining a copy of the trial file, which "was mostly missing and what did exist was in disarray."

Herndon told Runnels she had never requested the file from the Missouri State Public Defender, nor had she checked with the trial attorneys - because 1 was a friend and the trial had been difficult for her, and Herndon was hesitant to "bring it all up again," according to Runnels's affidavit.

In the fall of 2010, Nunley received a stay of execution based on a due process issue. Afterward, Runnels wrote, she "had essentially no contact" with Herndon, despite informing her that she was "able and willing" to continue working on the case.

This year, when Runnels learned through The Marshall Project's story of Herndon's previous law suspension, Runnels sent a copy of the article to Nunley's daughter. Afterward, Runnels spoke with Nunley on the phone. A rule of the Missouri Supreme Court says lawyers who are suspended must notify their clients. But, Runnels wrote, "Mr. Nunley told me that Ms. Herndon never informed him that she had been suspended from the practice of law, nor had Ms. Herndon obtained his consent to continue representing him ..."

Nunley also told Runnels that he had tried to fire Herndon in 2009 or 2010, but Herndon would not withdraw from the case, according to Runnels's affidavit.

Shynise Nunley Spencer, in her affidavit, wrote that she has kept a "consistent, close and loving relationship" with her father. Despite that, she wrote, "I have never, not once, spoken with Jennifer Herndon. She has never called me. She has never returned my calls. My brother has never spoken to her either."

Reading the story about Herndon made her feel "sick," the daughter wrote. "I was shocked to learn that she had been suspended from practicing law. ... I do not understand how the system allows someone in Ms. Herndon's situation to represent people in the most serious of all criminal cases, where their lives are at stake."

Herndon's last client to face execution was Richard Strong, condemned for the stabbing deaths of his girlfriend and her 2-year-old daughter. Herndon pleaded for a stay from the U.S. Supreme Court, but came up a vote short. Strong was put to death on the evening of June 9.

That same evening, Herndon went on her business's Facebook page and posted this message:

"I'm in the midst of a sad day. Then I watch the woman in front of me at the store pull out every card she has to try to cover her $20 grocery bill. In the end, she's 31 cents short.

Ponder for a moment what it's like not to have 31 cents to your name. Suddenly I'm feeling very grateful, and happy I could help someone out with a mere 31 cents. It's nothing until you don't have it!"

3 days after Herndon gave her fellow shopper 31 cents, Missouri filed its lien against Herndon, saying she owed the state more than $2,000.

(source: The Marshall Project)






KANSAS:

Right about death----GOP students call for Kan. party to seek death penalty's demise


Young people aren't afraid to speak up when they think their elders are misguided, and sometimes they're right. That's the case with a recent resolution from the Kansas Federation of College Republicans calling for the party to push to end the death penalty in Kansas.

For too long conservatives in the party have blindly supported the death penalty on one hand, while spouting support for being "pro-life" on the other. One view cancels out the other.

"More young conservatives like myself recognize that our broken and fallible system of capital punishment in no way matches up with our conservative values," the group's chairman, Dalton Glasscock, said in a statement. "By ending the death penalty, Kansas has an opportunity to promote a culture of life and fiscal responsibility. As Republicans - whether young or old - this is a smart reform that we should support."

The organization wants the Republican Party to create a plank in its political platform that vows to work to end the death penalty, then follow through by repealing the law allowing executions.

Republicans throughout Kansas history have supported banning the death penalty and the state itself has wrestled with capital punishment way too long. Kansas repealed the death penalty the 1st time in 1907, then reinstated it in 1935. The death penalty was struck down again in 1976 and then reinstated again in 1994. No execution has been carried out here since 1965.

It's not only life or death that should concern conservatives. The death penalty is also fiscally irresponsible.

Study after study has shown the death penalty is more costly to taxpayers than putting someone in prison for life with no chance of parole. The Republican Party is the one we look to take care of our state funds and spend them responsibly. The death penalty should be at the top of their list of cuts.

But as we saw this last legislative session, Kansas Republicans aren't the responsible party of the past. They would rather push for the death penalty as a misguided "tough on crime" stance that really does nothing to cut crime or protect society.

Rep. J.R. Claeys, R-Salina, used a modern social media tool, Twitter, to voice the tired old rhetoric: "(College Republicans) want cop killers to have a shot at adding child rape to their record," Claeys tweeted, adding a hashtag that said "#over my dead body."

One look at that statement and we know voices such as Claeys are simply talking loud without concern for making much sense.

It's time to make room for new, more reasonable voices, like the young people speaking up on our college campuses. Here's hoping they'll soon reach the age where they can run for public office, and in the meantime, the rest of the Republican Party will grow up.

(source: The Hutchinson News)






NEBRASKA:

Nebraska Bishops issue statement on death penalty restoration effort


Nebraska's 3 Catholic bishops issued a statement Thursday reaffirming their opposition to restoring the death penalty.

Omaha Archbishop George Lucas, Lincoln diocese Bishop James Conley, and Grand Island diocese Bishop Joseph Hanefeldt issued the statement 1 day after supporters of reinstating Nebraska's death penalty turned in petitions with more than 166,000 signatures, which would get the issue on the November 2016 ballot if the signatures are verified.

The bishops joint statement says: "Justice requires punishment, but it does not require that those who have committed serious crimes be put to death. The death penalty does not provide rehabilitation to convicted criminals. There is no clear evidence that executions deter crime. Racial minorities and the poor are disproportionately sentenced to death, often as a consequence of racial bias or inadequate defense due to an inability to pay for better representation. Other means are available to punish criminals and to protect society that are more respectful of human life."

"For the Catholic community, this issue - like all life issues - involves more than public policy. It involves our faith and the central principle that human life is sacred. Reflection on the God-given dignity of every human person should guide all our decisions about life, including refraining from the use of the death penalty."

State lawmakers voted to end capital punishment in May. Governor Pete Ricketts vetoed the measure, but the legislature overrode his veto. That triggered the petition drive to put the issue before voters. The more than 166,000 signatures stops the repeal before it was scheduled to take effect on Sunday. It will take about 40 days to verify the signatures.

(source: scrippsmedia.com)
_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to