July 10
CANADA:
Americans To Support Death Penalty: Poll
Canadians are more forward-thinking than Americans on a vast range of social
issues - with 1 surprising exception, a new poll suggests.
Abortion, pornography, and sex-same relationships are significantly more
accepted in Canada than the United States, according to results published
Saturday by Abacus Data.
But our feelings on the death penalty are about the same.
The poll suggests a majority of respondents in both countries support the death
penalty, with 58 % of Canadians and 59 % of Americans labeling the practice
"morally right."
But when it comes to abortion, assisted dying and same-sex relationships,
attitudes between Canada and the U.S. are more than 20 % points apart.
The numbers "confirm a more progressive, secular and libertarian predisposition
in Canada," Abacus Data chairman Bruce Anderson said in a release, even though
the trend didn't apply to views on capital punishment.
Abacus Data asked 1,500 Canadians whether they thought things like abortion,
same-sex relationships, and capital punishment are morally acceptable.
Results were then compared to American data sets released by Gallup. The online
survey, conducted between June 14 to 16, has a margin of error of 2.6 % points,
19 times out of 20.
Last Canadian inmates hanged in 1962
The death penalty was officially abolished in Canada in 1976 by then-prime
minister Pierre Trudeau.
No one had been executed for 14 years in Canada when the death penalty was
scrapped.
However, the death penalty remains legal in 31 U.S. states. Use of the practice
remains wildly uneven across the country.
In 2015, for instance, 6 states executed 28 inmates. 93 % of those executions
took place in Texas, Missouri, Georgia, and Florida.
(source: Huffington Post Canada)
MALDIVES:
Maldives to have first execution in 60 years in order to showcase 'Islamic
credentials'
Beleaguered Maldives President Abdulla Yameen is adamant that the 1st execution
of a convict in 60 years will take place under his watch as a reiteration of
Maldives' Islamic credentials.
The politically isolated president, who is shunned by colleagues and family, is
refusing to intervene despite several scholars calling the proposed execution
un-Islamic.He has also ignored appeals of human rights groups and even the
United Nations to stay the execution.
22-year-old Hussain Humaam Ahamed was condemned to death by the Maldives
Supreme Court in 2014 for the murder of a Member of Parliament, Afrasheem Ali,
in 2012.
The verdict was based on a confession that was obtained when he was in custody,
which he retracted later. The Supreme Court, over which President Yameen has a
stranglehold, disregarded the claim that Humaam has a mental disability and the
request for an independent psychiatric evaluation.
If the death sentence is carried out, it will be the 1st execution in the
Maldives since 1953.
The voices of protest have been crushed in the Maldives due to strict curbs,
but renowned Islamic scholar at the University of Oxford, Tariq Ramadan, in a
letter to President Yameen, has listed out reasons why the proposed execution
is un-Islamic.
Citing extensively from the Hudud - the Islamic Penal Code, Ramadan has argued
that 22-year-old Humaam's death penalty contravened many basic prescriptions in
the Shariah.
Stating that Humaam's 'confession' was forcefully obtained, undermining
fairness of his trial at a basic level, Ramadan has pointed out that pleas made
by Humaam's family that he was suffering from mental disability, has been
totally disregarded by the court.
This, Ramadan argues, is also against Islamic law and jurisprudence as any
doubt about the mental health of a murderer should play in his or her favour.
The heavy conditions found in the Islamic legislation have as a raison d'etre
('illah) to avoid any doubt; if there is the slightest doubt, then the
punishment should be suspended.
Ramadan also emphasises that it was un-Islamic on the part of President Yameen
to ignore requests of the victim's father and brother, who have stated that
they do not wish the death sentence to be implemented.
This call to spare Humaam's life by 2 members of the victim's family cannot be
ignored under Sharia law. According to the principles of qisas, if the family
of the victim asks for the sentence not to be implemented at any time before
the execution (for the majority of the 'ulama'), the latter should be suspended
whatever the public authority might decide.
If Yameen were to respect Shariah conditions, it is imperative for him to
listen to the family's position, says the scholar. Ramadan adds that the above
and beyond all of this, Rahmah (compassion) is an absolute necessity and an
essential principle even if there is no element of doubt and conditions are
met.
Tariq Ramadan has categorically stated in his letter to President Yameen that
Humaam's execution would contravene the fundamental principles of Islamic law
and urged the latter to take all possible actions to prevent the execution.
Tariq Ramadan has got support from human rights groups around the world who
have appealed to the Maldivian president that International law prohibits the
use of death penalty against people with mental disabilities. But President
Yameen, who has reintroduced capital punishment after a moratorium of 60 years,
seems determined to not just stop the arbitrary deprivation of life but also
break the tenets of Islamic law.
Ever since President Yameen reintroduced the death penalty in Maldives,
execution facilities have been constructed at the Maldives' Maafushi Prison.
The age of criminal responsibility is 10 in the Maldives which means that even
juvelines could potentially face execution.
(source: siasat.com)
KENYA:
It's time to implement the death penalty
The debate over the death penalty has for some time been relegated to the
backburner for reasons best known to authorities. Proponents and opponents of
the same are divided down the middle. The opponents allege that death penalty
is against the Bill of Rights which gives each and every individual the right
to life. They also argue this sentence does not have a deterrent effect, does
not rehabilitate and that it's savage, beastly and inhuman.
Proponents on the other hand argue that the principle of just desserts compels
a life to repay with another, an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth school.
They also argue that death penalty will incapacitate permanently these psychos
some of whom are responsible for multiple murders.
The Kenyan Penal Code Section 25 outlines death as one of the sentences that
may be passed for capital offences. It states, "(1)Where any person is
sentenced to death, the form of the sentence shall be to the effect only that
he is to suffer death in the manner authorized by law. (2)Sentence of death
shall not be pronounced on or recorded against any person convicted of an
offence if it appears to the court that at the time when the offence was
committed he was under the age of eighteen years, but in lieu thereof the court
shall sentence such person to be detained during the President's pleasure, and
if so sentenced he shall be liable to be detained in such place and under such
conditions as the President may direct, and whilst so detained shall be deemed
to be in legal custody."
Since 1987, Kenya has not carried out a single execution despite savagery and
beastly crimes committed since. We instead put these psychos in condemned
cells, over feed them, commute their sentences to life imprisonment and
eventually release them back to the society to mock their victims.
The hangmen in our prisons are idle and have now become rusty, the dexterity of
tightening a noose having deserted them after years of inaction. It's time we
let them earn their pay. The tax payer is being shortchanged.
In America, a liberal democracy, 31 states still practice the death penalty
only 21 have abolished it. The US government and military are among those which
carry out the death penalty. Although methods vary from state to state from
lethal injection or gas to firing squad, hanging or electrocution.
To imagine that you will treat a felon who commits larceny the same as the one
who cuts out the tongues of his victims, crushes their testicles, and gouges
their eyes out and proceeds to dismember the bodies is absurd and unfair. This
is a creature who won???t find company even among the most savage of beasts.
He/she is a misfit, a testament of creation gone wrong who should be
exterminated with speed to ensure he does not pollute the human race.
Anyone who does not value the life of another does not also value his own life.
Why should we value his? It will be a welcome break if we make grand corruption
(theft of over 1 billion shillings) a capital offence. Ask China how they deal
with the corrupt.
(soruce: Kungu Wanjiru, standardmedia.co.ke)
PHILIPPINES:
Death penalty a priority, Duterte tells lawmakers
President Rodrigo Duterte told lawmakers visiting Davao City Saturday night
that he wants the reimposition of the death penalty as a priority measure once
Congress convenes on July 25.
"He [said] so many officials are involved. It's like treason to him because
they should be the ones who protect the people [from illegal drugs] yet they
are the cause of its rampant spread in the country," Senator Juan Edgardo
Angara, one of the lawmakers, said.
"He's very serious about it [the death penalty]. He believes it should be
brought back," Angara added.
2 senators, 2 governors, and 12 congressmen from the incoming majority bloc
flew to Davao City for a 5-hour meeting with the President.
Among those present were Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, Angara, Citizens' Battle
Against Corruption Rep. Sherwin Tugna, Marinduque Rep. Lord Allan Jay Velasco,
Palawan 1st District Rep. Franz Josef Alvarez, and Masbate 3rd District Rep.
Scott Davies Lanete.
Also present were Tarlac Gov. Susan Yap and Bataan Gov. Albert Raymond Garcia.
The lawmakers assured Duterte they would support whatever measure he submits to
Congress.
"We are open to that [reinstating the death penalty)]" Angara said. "We will
listen to the arguments."
The senator added, however, that in the final vote, each lawmaker would have to
vote his or her conscience.
Tugna said Duterte did not specifically request for new anti-drug laws to be
passed as existing measures are already in place.
"I believe he [Duterte] has a good track record of implementing them," he
added.
Before he took his oath of office, Duterte told House leaders that he prefers
to publicly hang criminals instead of killing them with a lethal injection.
After the 5-hour discussion at the After Dark Resto Bar, the President gave his
guests a tour of the Central 911 headquarters. They parted ways at around 3:30
a.m.
Both Angara and Tugna agreed that Duterte seemed different when he is in Davao
City.
"He's in his comfort zone in Davao. It's better to see him in Davao," Angara
said.
"He's more relaxed here," Tugna added.
Lawmakers said they are glad that Duterte made time to meet informally with
them.
His predecessor, President Benigno Aquino III, had been criticized for not
making good use of the Legislative Executive Development Advisory Council.
Buhay party-list Rep. Lito Atienza, who opposes the death penalty, said
reinstating capital punishment would undermine efforts by the Philippines to
save the lives of Filipinos working overseas who are on death row.
"One of the many ramifications [of the return of the death penalty] is that the
Philippine government would be deprived of the moral high ground when it comes
to our official appeals for clemency - for foreign governments to spare the
lives of our citizens who are facing execution," Atienza said.
"Should Congress reinstate the cruel and inhuman punishment, it would be
extremely problematic for us to plead with other governments for compassion, if
we ourselves are killing own convicts here - if we ourselves do not respect the
value of human life," Atienza added.
At least 88 Filipinos are facing the death penalty abroad, mostly in Malaysia
and China, for various felonies, the Department of Foreign Affairs says.
The 88 includes Mary Jane Veloso, the 31-year-old Filipino woman who was set to
be executed by firing squad in Indonesia last year, but who obtained a
last-minute reprieve after Manila asked Jakarta that she be first allowed to
provide testimonial evidence against her alleged human trafficker in a criminal
case in the Philippines.
8 of the top 10 foreign destinations of Filipino workers overseas "are on
record as subscribing to capital punishment and aggressively carrying out
executions," Atienza said.
Of the 10, Atienza said, only Canada and Hong Kong have abolished the death
penalty, while the rest are actively killing convicts.
(source: The Standard)
*******
Death penalty restoration may doom 88 OFWs on death row
Mary Jane Veloso and 87 other overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) languishing in
death row in overseas prisons will be deprived of a chance of absolution as
soon as the capital punishment is restored in the Philippines, Buhay Party-list
Rep. Lito Atienza warned.
Meantime, the Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) is expected
to come out with a statement on death penalty anytime soon.
LOSING MORAL HIGH GROUND
Atienza stressed that the Philippine government's efforts to save the lives of
OFWs in death prisons overseas will effectively be counteracted by the death
penalty bill being pushed by the Duterte administration.
"One of the many ramifications (of the return of the death penalty) is that the
Philippine government would be deprived of the moral high ground when it comes
to our official appeals for clemency - for foreign governments to spare the
lives of our citizens who are facing execution," said Atienza, who is pushing
for a pro-life legislative agenda.
"Should Congress reinstate the cruel and inhuman punishment, it would be
extremely problematic for us to plead with other governments for compassion, if
we ourselves are killing own convicts here - if we ourselves do not respect the
value of human life," Atienza added.
SAVING MARY JANE
With the help of former Vice President Jejomar C. Binay, now Senator Manny
Pacquiao and the Aquino administration, Veloso, a drug convict in Indonesia,
was granted a temporary reprieve last year.
She was saved from the series of executions carried out on April 29, 2015 by
the Indonesian government.
Executed that day in Nusa Kambangan were Australians Andrew Chan and Myuran
Sukumaran; Brazilian Rodrigo Gularte, 4 Nigerians and an Indonesian.
Citing a report from the Department of Foreign Affairs, Atienza said at least
87 other OFWs are confronted with the death sentence abroad, most of them in
Malaysia and China.
CHURCH'S STAND
A Church source said it was CBCP president Lingayen Dagupan Archbishop Socrates
Villegas who told him of the plan to release a statement.
However, it was not clear if the statement will be released at the end of the
bishops' Plenary Assembly which started Saturday at the Pope Pius XII Catholic
Center in Manila.
The CBCP usually issue a collective statement on pastoral and social issues
after their 3-day gathering.
But a check with Manila Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo revealed that the
bishops have yet to discuss the issue as ofSunday morning.
But a number of Catholic prelates earlier already expressed their opposition to
the idea of reviving death penalty saying it's against moral law.
"Death penalty by hanging is against moral law. Human life is sacred because it
comes from God, the Creator. No one, not even the State, may take a human life,
even of hardened criminals," said Malolos Bishop Jose Oliveros.
(source: Manila Bulletin)
_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu
DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty
