Jan. 3



TEXAS:

Brakes applied on death penalty cases


The death penalty is rare, even in Texas, where just 7 executions were carried out last year. In some places, it's almost non-existent. In Dallas and Harris Counties, not a single death sentence was handed down last year.

This is good news.

Executions are costly. Their value in deterring would-be murderers and others from committing their crimes is small. And they are disproportionately carried out against persons of color. Of the 9 men sentenced to death in Dallas or Tarrant Counties since 2012, all are African-American. In Harris County, 15 of the 18 more recent death sentences have been handed down against black defendants, the other three against Latinos.

Worst of all, an execution is the outcome of an error-prone system, and one that simply can't be undone once carried out.

That insight was at the heart of the ruling 45 years ago in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the death penalty violated the Constitution.

"The penalty of death differs from all other forms of criminal punishment, not in degree but in kind," Justice Potter Stewart wrote in 1 of 5 concurring opinions in Furman v Georgia. "It is unique in its total irrevocability. It is unique in its rejection of rehabilitation of the convict as a basic purpose of criminal justice."

4 years later, the court ruled that with proper attention to racial fairness and other factors, the executions could resume. But ever since, Texas has had a starring role in demonstrating just how naive that second decision was.

It's distressing to note that support for the death penalty remains strong in many states, including Texas (though that support is at its lowest level in decades). There is hope in the fact that actual use of the death penalty is fading fast.

In the past 5 years, 26 inmates on Texas' death row have been removed. 18 saw their sentences reduced. 7 died in custody. 1 was exonerated and released.

Even Texas' famously tough-on-crime Court of Criminal Appeals has grown far more careful when it comes to executions. In the past 2 years, the court has issued 15 stays of execution. In the 3 years before that, it averaged just 1 per year.

Nationwide, the use of the death penalty is also at a low.

It's encouraging, too, to see Justice Stephen Breyer continue his sometimes-lonely crusade to convince the rest of the court to take up again, as they did in 1972 and 1976, the overall question of whether the Bill of Rights prohibits executions.

The penalty is so rare, and so random in its application, it should no longer be tolerated: "Individuals who are executed are not the 'worst of the worst,'" Breyer wrote Dec. 12, "but, rather, are individuals chosen at random, on the basis, perhaps of geography, perhaps of the views of individual prosecutors, or still worse on the basis of race."

(source: Editorial, Dallas Morning News)






NORTH CAROLINA:

Shaniya Davis killer revives death penalty issues.


Mario Andrette McNeill won't be the poster boy for getting rid of the death penalty. We can???t think of anyone on death row we'd rather see with a lethal injection in his arm.

McNeill is the monster who took 5-year-old Shaniya Davis from her mother in 2009, in return for a $200 drug debt. McNeill raped the little girl and killed her, tossing her body into a remote kudzu patch where deer hunters gut their kills.

Shaniya's mother got off easier than she deserved, with a 17-year sentence for 2nd-degree murder. McNeill offered no defense at his trial, saying in 2013 that, "My goal was freedom. I lost my freedom. What does it matter after that?"

3 years later, it appears that staying alive does matter to him. And so does freedom. His lawyers are asking the state Supreme Court to overturn his conviction because his original lawyers were too cooperative with the police.

McNeill will get his hearing. All death row prisoners automatically get one. And we'll only hope - along with most North Carolina residents - that he isn't set free.

But even though McNeill is the worst imaginable reason for taking the death penalty off the books, his case offers another opportunity to talk about it.

Like most other states, North Carolina doesn't have much of an appetite for executions these days. We've got 150 prisoners on death row - including 1 who's been there for 31 years - but haven't executed anyone in more than a decade, owing to a host of legal challenges. It doesn't appear likely there will be any executions in 2017, either.

We don't want McNeill to have any chance of regaining his freedom. His horrific crime deserves no mercy.

But it's also clear that our society is steadily moving away from the death penalty, as state after state takes capital punishment off its books. There are good reasons for that, starting with the potential for mistakes in identification, investigation and prosecution. And there is the fundamental question of whether anyone - including the state - should have the right to kill.

We expect that North Carolina will be one of the last states to formally end capital punishment. But during this lengthy break from executions, we hope state prosecutors do all in their power to ensure that monsters like Mario Andrette McNeill are never let out of their cage.

(source: Editorial, Fayetteville Observer)






FLORIDA:

New state attorney faces expectations, potential pitfalls as she takes office


A year ago at this time Melissa Nelson was a relatively unknown lawyer. Tuesday morning she will enter the Ed Austin Building next to the Duval County Courthouse as the new state attorney for the 4th Judicial Circuit, one of the most powerful offices in Northeast Florida.

It's the conclusion of a remarkable year for Nelson and the start of a new year where she will have to define herself to a public that is still getting to know her. She is still in a honeymoon period, but challenges await.

"It is going to happen," Nelson said during an interview days before taking office. "I'm going to make a decision that disappoints people. But I'm committed to make the right decisions, even if it's unpopular."

Nelson comes into office during a time of upheaval in criminal justice. The death penalty is in flux with dozens of death sentences likely being thrown out locally, minimum-mandatory sentences are increasingly being questioned even by conservatives, prosecuting juveniles as adults is becoming more and more unpopular, medical marijuana was just legalized and questions on whether the criminal justice system is unfair to minorities have become a polarizing issue.

"The lens in which we view criminal justice is changing," said Audrey Moran, JAX Chamber chairwoman, a senior vice president at Baptist Health and a prominent Nelson supporter. "But I think that's a tremendous opportunity for her."

Moran said Nelson has the experience and talent to be a state attorney like Ed Austin, the former top prosecutor and mayor whose name adorns the building Nelson will be working in.

"She's been a prosecutor, she's worked in private practice, she's defended criminals," Moran said. "She understands that a prosecutor has enormous power and she'll use that power responsibly."

Austin, who was once Moran's boss at the State Attorney's Office, was someone who could make a controversial decision and still maintain the trust of the community because people believed he was doing what he thought was best.

"No one ever questioned his motives, even when they disagreed with his decisions," Moran said.

Nelson defeated outgoing State Attorney Angela Corey in a landslide Republican primary that decided the election since no Democrats filed. She had assembled a coalition of support ranging from the National Rifle Association to liberal trial lawyers. Many were motivated by dislike of Corey, who had become an increasingly polarizing figure locally and nationwide.

"There are plenty of people, even those that voted for Nelson, who don't know much about her," said former Public Defender Bill White. "They were voting against Angela more than they were voting for Melissa."

But Corey is gone, and Nelson will now be judged on her own merits.

"Melissa really hasn't been defined yet," said former Jacksonville Mayor John Delaney, who supported Corey in the election.

Nelson said the reaction she's gotten since the election has been overwhelmingly positive, even among those who didn't support her before.

"I think people are excited about our desire to change the culture of that office," Nelson said. "I've not experienced any hostility, and I've had very positive meetings with a lot of different people in the community."

Minorities, juveniles, death cases

Many contacted by the Times-Union expressed optimism.

"We're looking forward to working with her," said said Jacksonville NAACP President Isaiah Rumlin. "We're hoping she can re-establish credibility that office has not had within the minority community in the last 8 years."

Nelson has met with the NAACP multiple times and committed to having regular meetings when in office, Rumlin said.

Jim Clark, CEO of Daniel Kids, a Jacksonville nonprofit that helps foster care children and others with emotional or abuse problems, said he was heartened by Nelson's willingness to explore more ways to keep juveniles out of the criminal justice system.

Corey was often criticized for not using civil citations enough and trying too many juveniles as adults in the criminal justice system. Nelson has demonstrated a desire to keep juveniles out of the adult system and to keep them from having a criminal record whenever possible, Clark said.

"We've had people who've done one stupid thing and it's trailed them for decades," Clark said. "We've had fights where no one was seriously hurt or bleeding and those kids were arrested. That doesn't help anyone and it doesn't make the community safer."

Nelson said any transfer of a case from juvenile to adult court will be reviewed by Lee Hutton, one of her chief deputies, and she will try to keep juveniles out of adult court unless the crime is so severe that she has no other choice.

How Nelson handles juvenile issues will be watched nationwide, said Marsha Levick, a Philadelphia attorney and co-founder of the Juvenile Law Center.

"For decades Florida has been notable for transferring a lot of juveniles into adult court," Levick said. "To see that turn around would be a big step somewhere like Jacksonville."

In November, Nelson indicated she was open to having what is called a "conviction integrity unit" that tasks a group of prosecutors to seek out and reverse wrongful convictions. If Nelson follows through, it would be the 1st such unit in Florida.

John Hollway, executive director of the Quattrone Center for the Fair Administration of Justice at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, said these units send a message to the community that prosecutors care about justice and not just getting convictions.

"The role of the prosecutor is changing," Hollway said. "They have tremendous power in our system and good prosecutors see themselves as ministers of justice."

Death penalty opponents also are happy to see Nelson's arrival even though she is a death penalty supporter. At one point the Times-Union estimated that Corey had put 3 times as many people on death row compared to any other prosecutor in the state during her tenure in office.

"We would expect to see a more judicious process under Nelson," said Mark Elliott, executive director of Floridians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. "What has happened before was extreme and out of control. Hopefully we'll have more fairness."

Nelson will likely have dozens of death penalty cases coming back to her office for resentencing after the Florida Supreme Court issued a ruling last week that suggests all death sentences since 2002 will be overturned when the jury did not unanimously recommend death. The U.S. and Florida supreme courts have issued multiple rulings striking down Florida's death penalty procedures, which previously allowed people to be put to death with a simple majority of jurors favoring death.

Nelson said she will determine who gets the death penalty differently. A committee of lawyers will look at each potential death case and if that committee doesn't think death is justified, the prosecutor can't seek death, and the cases coming back for resentencing will also go through this committee.

The committee is modeled on a similar one in the office of Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle.

Relationships and reputation

White, the former public defender, cautions that Nelson can't get a reputation for being soft on crime.

"She's going to run into some serious challenges very quickly," White said.

While Corey was defeated, there's still a large segment of the population that agree with her "tough on crime" attitude, which often involved locking people up, rejecting plea deals and seeking maximum sentences whenever possible, White said.

But Moran said she wasn't worried about that possibilty.

"She will be tough when she needs to be tough," Moran said. "But you have to be a responsible grown-up, and that's Melissa."

Nelson will be fine if she does a good job explaining her actions, that was one of Austin's strengths and one of the things Corey struggled with, said Delaney, who worked with both.

White also said Nelson's relationship with Jacksonville Sheriff Mike Williams, who endorsed Corey during the election, bears watching. Corey had a close relationship with Williams and former Sheriff John Rutherford, whereas former State Attorney Harry Shorstein, who was the chief prosecutor throughout most of the time Nelson worked in the office, had a tense relationship with Rutherford and the 2 didn't hide their dislike for each other by the end of Shorstein's tenure.

White said Corey viewed herself as a supporter of police and never criticized them, unlike Shorstein who would often criticize the actions of the department.

Nelson needs to be independent of police, while also avoiding having an antagonistic relationship with them, White said.

Shorstein, a vocal Nelson supporter during the election, said he doesn't think she will have a relationship with Williams similar to his with Rutherford.

"Melissa is more diplomatic than I was," Shorstein said. "I spoke my mind because I thought Rutherford was terrible, I can't see Melissa doing that with Williams."

Delaney said he doesn't think Nelson will have any problems with the sheriff, who could not be reached for comment.

"Politicians either view people who support their opponents as enemies or future allies," Delaney said. "I think Melissa will treat people as future allies."

Nelson said she's had several productive meetings with Williams and hopes to work with him to increase trust in law enforcement in the minority community.

"While we work together and have similar goals, we will not always agree," Nelson said.

Retaining staff

Nelson also didn't clean house. She said 8 staff members - much less than when Corey took over - were not offered to stay onboard. Nelson also is keeping many of Corey's top people, including Assistant State Attorneys Bernie de la Rionda and Mark Caliel.

"That office is full of excellent attorneys," Nelson said. "I want to treat them like the professionals they are."

Nelson said she focused on the quality of the work being done and not on whether someone had been a supporter of her opponent.

In her final interview with the Times-Union before taking office, Nelson said she knew criticism was coming her way soon and she will try to remember that it isn't personal. When asked what she hoped people would think and say about her 4 years from now, she paused to think about it.

"I hope that people respect me," she said. "And I hope that people believe I've been fair and I've been honest."

-------

5 changes Melissa Nelson plans to make

-- Improve the office's relationship with the minority community, which largely didn't get to vote in the Republican primary where Nelson was elected because most minorities aren't registered Republicans.

-- Seek to issue more civil citations instead of charging juveniles with crimes.

-- Have a comprehensive review process where one of Nelson's top deputies must sign off on any direct file where a juvenile is charged as an adult with a crime.

-- Have a committee review all murder cases where the trial prosecutor wants to seek death. If the committee decides death isn't warranted, Nelson can't overrule the committee.

-- Look into creating a "conviction integrity unit" that will look for wrongful convictions. Nelson has said she wants to do this but isn't sure her office will have enough money.

(source: Florida Times-Union)






ALABAMA:

Petersen trial enters penalty phase


The penalty phase of Ryan Petersen's capital murder trial is expected to begin today as Petersen's defense attorneys begin their attempt to spare him from the death penalty.

Petersen was convicted of capital murder and attempted murder last month related to a 2012 shooting at Teasers that killed 3 people and injured 1. According to police, Petersen was ejected from the club after getting into an argument with a Teasers employee. Police reports say Petersen then went to his vehicle, got a handgun and returned to the establishment, shooting Cameron Paul Eubanks, 20, the son of the club's owner, outside the club. Prosecutors said Petersen shot Eubanks several times in the pelvis and chest before shooting him in the head.

Police said Petersen then re-entered the club and next shot Scotty Russell, a patron of the nightclub, wounding him. After shooting Russell, Petersen shot Tiffany Grissett, a dancer at the club, once and then chased her into the bathroom and shot her again. He then shot Thomas Robins Jr. to death and fled the club, police said.

During Petersen's trial, his defense presented testimony that Petersen had a history of psychological issues resulting in involuntary commitments. Petersen's defense also presented evidence of long-term substance abuse issues and argued that he was intoxicated at the time of the shootings.

Prosecutors have argued that Petersen was sufficiently competent to be responsible for his actions. During Petersen's trial prosecutors presented testimony from witnesses that Petersen appeared to be focused and determined during the shootings.

(source: Dothan Eagle)






TENNESSEE:

Inmate On Death Row Begs For Fingerprints To Be Tested Before Execution; Here Are The Results


In an attempt to prove his innocence, a Tennessee prisoner on death row inadvertently provided more evidence that he committed the crime.

In 2003, Marlon Kiser was sentenced to death row for killing Hamilton County Deputy Donald Bond, Times Free Press reports.

Yet the man has repeatedly denied the charges, saying his former roommate - James Michael Chattin - framed him.

Kiser took to his website, FreeMarlonKiser.com, to make his claim:

... James Michael Chattin had discovered that a Hamilton County Sheriff's Deputy named Donald Kenneth Bond Jr. was seemingly having an affair with Tina Chattin who was Mike Chattin's wife. On several different occasions, Mike Chattin has stated to several different individuals that his wife was seeing a cop and that he was going to kill him, and in the early morning hours of September 6th, 2001, that is exactly what Mike Chattin did.

And then, to throw suspicion off of Mike Chattin, he ran to police pointing his finger at me because I had a pending police brutality lawsuit against the Chattanooga Police Department since 1998 which was scheduled to be heard on September 17th, 11 days after Deputy Donald Bond's death.

Kiser added that after he found out about Chattin's drug habits, he asked him to vacate the premise.

That was the straw that broke the camel's back, he said.

"In Mike Chattin's perry old mind, he could not allow me to leave because I knew entirely too many secrets about him," Kiser wrote, adding that Chattin had also previously asked him to kill the police officer.

Kiser also started a petition to get him off the death penalty, which has received over 470 signatures as of May 19. The petition's stated goal is 1,000 signatures.

"Marlon Kiser is on death row, because of police corruption, and police ineptness," one person who signed the petition wrote in the comments section. "Marlon knew about Mike Chattin's criminal activities, and therefore Marlon was a liability to Mike Chattin."

Kiser also petitioned the court for post-conviction relief, Times Free Press notes. As part of that petition, in March 2015, his attorneys had authorities test palm and fingerprints on Bond's flashlight and car.

The results revealed the prints were Kiser's. Previous evidence linking Kiser to the crime reportedly included fibers from Bond's clothes.

(source: opposingviews.com)

_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to