May 23



INDIA:

Nirbhaya rapists to hang: Supreme Court has ordered death sentence to the 4 convicts



Finally. Today humanity has won its combat. The apex court has ordered to hang 4 out of 6 convicts of Nirbhaya rape case. This heinous crime was executed by 6 people in 2012, and the girl lost her life. These 4 men are Vinay, Pawan, Akshay, and Mukesh. Ram Singh who was 1 the 6 accused hanged himself in prison. Another of them who was a juvenile that time was sent to reform home in August last year.

The Supreme Court while delivering the order said that this murder case was the rarest one. We are bound to give them the extreme punishment to ensure justice. This is a really a marvelous decision taken by the honorable court. In fact, such steps will stop similar incidents from happening in the future. When the court read out its verdict, an echo aroused. The crowded courtroom was filled with applauds.

Back in March 2014, the convicts of the rape case appealed the Delhi High Court when the trial court ordered to hang them in 2013. Delhi High Court also rejected their plea. Later, they approached Supreme Court but failed to secure their life.

Today, Nirbhaya's parents are surely on top of the world as their daughter has got justice. The criminals who have committed this brutal, barbaric crime don't really deserve any leniency. Not just Nirbhaya's father but the whole nation has similar feelings. The order is appreciated by the whole country.

6 men raped a 23-year old medical student in a moving bus in Delhi. Her intestine was pulled out. After the rape, she and her male friend were thrown out of the bus. She was sent to AIIMS for immediate treatment. But because of her critical condition, she was moved to Singapore hospital On December 29th; there she lost her battle for life. The accused really deserve this punishment. The only thing that makes us sad is why this decision is taken so late. They were to be hanged immediately. Unfortunately, we are bound by laws and regulations.

Nirbhaya's parents have similar feelings. Before the hearing this morning, her mother, Asha Devi said that not just the apex court, even supreme God would not forgive such people. They must be sentenced to death. She said that only death penalty was the right punishment for these criminals.

Talking to media, she said that they had full trust in the judiciary system and they were sure that the apex court would order the death sentence. She added that Supreme Court would surely do justice to their beloved daughter and would set an example for the world.

When media approached the defending lawyer of these criminals, he said that it was not fair to give death sentence just to set an example for the society. Mr. AP Singh who is fighting the case of these convicts added that justice was not done. They would file a review petition against this order.

Today court has praised the work of Delhi Police for arresting the criminals. The SC added that the probe done by Delhi police was commendable and fair. It has passed all tests of fairness and reliability. Based on the medical evidence, the death sentence is fairly justified.

5 years back this rape case had shocked everyone. Everyone was moaning when they have heard this brutal rape story. But today Nirbhaya has got justice; her soul may now rest in peace.

(soruce: brinkwire.com)

****************

Malaysian state-linked media left scrambling after polls upset----The pace of the trial, the intensifying push for speedy hearings in rape cases, and questions about the legal defence provided to Gadke - who pleaded not guilty - have raised concerns among some legal rights advocates.



Naveen Gadke was arrested on April 20 and charged with the rape and murder of a baby girl in central India.

3 weeks later a court sentenced the 26-year-old odd-job man to death in the fastest such trial known to have happened in modern India, a nation where public outrage is running high because of a series of rapes and related killings.

Police, prosecutors and the district court in the city of Indore worked at a furious pace to get the conviction quickly, amid a backlash on the streets, including marches in this city of about 2 million, 550 miles south of Delhi.

This is in a country where Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government last month introduced the death penalty for rapes of girls under 12 years in response to public pressure but which has a notoriously slow court system, with cases taking at least six years on average to the final ruling, according to governance tracking group Daksh.

But the pace of the trial, the intensifying push for speedy hearings in rape cases, and questions about the legal defence provided to Gadke - who pleaded not guilty - have raised concerns among some legal rights advocates.

They are fearful there will be wrongful convictions and hangings when a defendant cannot afford to hire a good lawyer.

"While expeditious trials are ideal, these should not be at the cost of fair trial safeguards like the right to adequate time to prepare a defence and the presumption of innocence," said Leah Verghese, senior campaigner at human rights group Amnesty International India, in an email response to questions.

Senior Supreme Court lawyer Rebecca John said she was concerned. "As a principle, I am opposed to rushing through investigative processes and trial processes" she said.

But reflecting the mood of the nation, well-known Supreme Court lawyer Dushyant Dave, a vocal supporter of capital punishment, said India "needs to send at least 500 people to death in the next one year to end this endemic" of rape.

"Our system is archaic and extremely inefficient," he added.

Such views have resonated with the mother of the dead 3-month-old girl as she sat on the front yard of a 200-year-old palace where her homeless family sleeps in the open.

She told Reuters she was happy with the swift verdict but her daughter would get justice only when Gadke is hung to death, just as quickly.

"Once such men are hanged, no one will dare to do anything like this to any girl," she said.

Rape victims and their families cannot be identified under Indian law.

Gadke could not be contacted as journalists are not allowed to speak with convicts in jail as per a home ministry directive. Sachin Verma, Gadke???s lawyer, said his client told him that his estranged wife "framed" him, but said little else.

Reuters could not trace Gadke's wife to seek comment.

Slapping and Shoving

At trial, the mother, police officers and the prosecution lawyer said security cameras showed Gadke taking away the infant as she lay asleep by her parents. 15 minutes later, he was seen coming out of the basement of a nearby building, where her blood-smeared body was found, police said.

Medical tests, completed quickly under instructions from government officials, confirmed she was raped, and the semen from a vaginal swab was found to be a DNA match with Gadke, according to court documents reviewed by Reuters.

Gadke's lawyer Verma, who specialises in matters related to crimes against children, said he reluctantly took the case on state government orders.

That was after 4 other lawyers refused to defend Gadke, Verma said. In a sign of how high temperatures were rising in the community, around a dozen lawyers attacked the defendant outside the court when he first arrived, slapping and shoving him, according to police.

Prosecutors presented 29 witnesses, including police and shopkeepers who found the victim's body, and "everybody supported the prosecution", said Verma. He presented no witnesses for Gadke's defence.

Verma said he could have done better if he had more time to prepare for the case.

"They had to create a story and they had to decide quickly," said Verma, who is expecting to receive 4,000 rupees (RM 232.82) from the state government for representing Gadke. "My client told me: 'Everyone has already decided I am guilty. What's the point of all this?'"

Special prosecutor Mohammad Akram Shaikh said that they had "conclusive evidence" against Gadke.

Judge Varsha Sharma, who deals with matters related to crimes against children and ruled on the case, declined to comment.

Sending Message

Police pressed charges against Gadke within 7 days of the crime, said Police Inspector Shivpal Singh Kushwah.

"All of us wanted to send a message that the law can work fast, and we succeeded," he said.

The court sat for seven straight working days to hear the case, unusual in India where one court is often dipping in and out of several cases on the same day. A government-run laboratory conducted tests on forensic evidence within 4 days of a police request. This usually takes more than a month, Kushwah said.

After hearing details of his crime from Shaikh and the witnesses, Judge Sharma found Gadke guilty and ordered his death by hanging.

"This falls under the rarest of rare case and it would be appropriate to hand such a criminal the toughest punishment," the judge declared.

The sentence has to be confirmed by a higher court, for which Gadke will be provided a different lawyer by the state government. The court's decision can be challenged in the Supreme Court. An appeal to India's president is the last resort. The entire process can take years.

Acceleration Demanded

Even before Gadke's trial, there were growing calls to speed up child rape trials.

Lower courts take an average of 5 years to complete cases of prisoners sentenced to death, high courts 1 year and 4 months, and the Supreme Court 2 years and 1 month, according to a 2016 report by the Centre on the Death Penalty in the National Law University of Delhi.

The university study found that 74% of 373 death row prisoners they interviewed were economically vulnerable. The majority were from low castes and religious minorities. In the Indore case, Gadke did various jobs like cleaning utensils in eateries.

By contrast, trials involving India's rich and powerful sometimes take more than 10 years. Gurmeet Ram Rahim, a wealthy self-styled godman who had many followers, was convicted last year on charges of raping 2 followers - 15 years after the case was registered.

Government statistics show that since 2012, when a young woman was gang-raped in a moving bus in Delhi igniting national uproar, reported rape cases have climbed 60% to around 40,000 in 2016 - about 1 every 15 minutes - with child rape accounting for about 40%.

(source: freemalaysiatoday.com)








ALGERIA:

Blogger facing death penalty for online posts



The trial of an Algerian blogger who faces the death penalty on trumped-up espionage charges based on online posts is yet another stain on the country's human rights record, Amnesty International said today ahead of the opening hearing on 24 May.

Merzoug Touati faces charges relating to a Facebook post and YouTube video that authorities claim encouraged civil unrest. He has been in detention since January 2017.

Amnesty International has reviewed the court documents which list as "evidence" the posts published by Touati before his Facebook account and website were deleted, and found that there was no incitement to violence or advocacy of hatred, rather his posts were covered by freedom of expression in relation to his work as a citizen-journalist. Amnesty International therefore considers Merzoug Touati a prisoner of conscience held solely for expressing his peaceful opinions.

"Every day Merzoug Touati spends in prison is one day too many, and is a further stain on Algeria's human rights record. It is ludicrous that a Facebook post expressing peaceful opinion could lead to the death penalty. Touati represents the broken dreams of a generation in a country where freedom of expression has been repeatedly undermined," said Heba Morayef, Middle East and North Africa regional director at Amnesty International.

"Algeria must immediately free Touati, a prisoner of conscience, awaiting trial solely for expressing himself online."

Merzoug Touati has been in detention since 22 January 2017 and is currently held in El Khemis prison in the northern city of Bejaia. He has conducted at least 3 hunger strikes to protest against his extended detention. His trial is scheduled to begin tomorrow (Thursday 24 May).

Merzoug Touati is a university graduate who was unemployed at his time of arrest. He was not affiliated to any political party or association. In 2015, he began to run a Facebook page and a blog called alhogra.com, since deleted, writing mostly about political and human rights developments in Algeria.

During his interrogation, Merzoug Touati told the investigative judge that the interviews he had conducted with diplomats, human rights defenders and activists from different religious and political backgrounds were solely for documentation purposes for his online articles.

Background

Police arrested Merzoug Touati on 18 January 2017 after he published a post on Facebook and a video interview on his YouTube channel.

In the 1st post on 2 January 2017 he called for Bejaia residents to protest against a new Finance Law. In the 2nd post on YouTube on 8 January 2017, Merzoug Touati interviewed an Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson in which he disputes accusations by the Algerian authorities that the Israeli authorities were involved in protests in Algeria.

On 22 January 2017, the investigative judge in the Bejaia Tribunal ordered Merzoug Touati's pre-trial detention pending investigation on charges including incitement to violence and also espionage.

On 24 October 2017, the Indictment Chamber of the Bejaia Court formally referred the case to the Criminal Court charging Merzoug Touati with "incitement to take up arms against the authority of the state", "incitement to non-armed gathering", "foreign intelligence aiming at harming diplomatic ties", as well as "incitement to gatherings and sit-ins in public spaces".

In November 2017, defence lawyers appealed the indictment decision before the Supreme Court, but in April 2018, Merzoug Touati asked his lawyers to drop the appeal for fear that it would take longer than the verdict of the Criminal Court.

Merzoug Touati's lawyer Salah Dabouz told Amnesty International that "the blogger's detention has been extended on 2 occasions for 4 months, the 2nd of which expired on 22 January 2018. However, the investigative judge failed to order another renewal since then". Article 59 of the Algerian Constitution states that provisional detention should be exceptional and that arbitrary arrest is punished by law.

Amnesty International opposes the death penalty in all cases without exception regardless of the nature of the crime, the characteristics of the offender, or the method used by the state to kill the prisoner. The death penalty is a violation of the right to life and the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.

(source: Amnesty International)



BAHRAIN:

Bahrain court upholds death, life sentences----Defendants charged with murder of police officer



Bahrain's Cassation Court on Monday upheld the death sentence for 2 men convicted by lower courts on the charge of the premeditated murder of a police officer.

The court also upheld life in prison for 3 defendants and jail terms for the others varying from 3 to 10 years.

Only 1 of the 13 defendants was acquitted in the case where they faced charges of premeditated murder, attempted murder, forming a terror group, harbouring fugitives, failing to report a terrorist plot and possessing incendiary devices.

The public prosecution said it received information on April 14, 2016, from the police directorate in Manama about a group of terrorists who used Molotov cocktails to set a police patrol vehicle ablaze to kill officers.

Investigations revealed the terrorists had ambushed the patrol in Karbabad and doused it with petrol before setting it alight. 1 man burned to death and the other 2 suffered burns.

On June 5, 2017, the high court sentenced 2 defendants to death, 3 to life in jail, 3 to 10 years, 1 to 7 years, 1 to 5 years and 2 to 3 years. 1 suspect was acquitted.

The court of appeals on February 27 upheld the sentences.

(source: Gulf News)

**************

Bahrain court issues death sentences against 2 activists, revokes citizenship of none others



Bahrain has upheld death sentences against two activists as the ruling Al Khalifah regime intensifies its crackdown against political dissidents and pro-democracy campaigners in the tiny Persian Gulf kingdom.

The defendants, Ahmad al-Abbar and Hussein Mahdi, were sentenced to death by the Bahrain Criminal Court after they made forced confessions, according to the Manama Post website. Their charges were not immediately known.

Another Bahraini court also sentenced 9 citizens to jail and revoked their citizenship.

Separately, a court in the capital Manama on Sunday also sentenced 20 activists to prison sentences ranging from 3 to 15 years after they were convicted on "terrorism" charges.

This came days after a Bahrain court on Tuesday revoked the citizenship of 115 people at a mass terrorism trial.

The court ruling came as much of the Mideast was focusing on Israeli forces killing over dozens of Palestinian protesters as the US relocated its embassy from Tel Aviv to the occupied Jerusalem al-Quds the day before. Like much of the crackdown, it has quietly escaped attention.

The trials in Bahrain are often tainted with allegations of torture and coerced confessions. Hundreds have been sentenced to lengthy prison terms.

Activists say the number of those who have lost their citizenship in Bahrain since 2012 has risen to over 700.

Rights groups have accused Manama of employing its anti-terror legislation to jail and torture regime critics.

Lynn Maalouf, Middle East Director at Amnesty International, said in a statement on May 16 that "the Bahraini government is using revocation of nationality - rendering many of its citizens stateless in the process - and expulsion, as tools to crush all forms of opposition, dissent and activism."

The right to a nationality is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which Bahrain is a state party.

Thousands of anti-regime protesters have held numerous demonstrations in Bahrain on an almost daily basis ever since a popular uprising began in the country on February 14, 2011.

They are demanding that the Al Khalifah dynasty relinquish power and a just system representing all Bahrainis be established.

Manama has spared no effort in clamping down on dissent and rights activists. On March 14, 2011, troops from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates were deployed to Bahrain to assist the Manama government in its crackdown on peaceful protesters.

Scores of people have lost their lives and hundreds of others sustained injuries or got arrested as a result of Al Khalifah regime???s crackdown on anti-regime activists.

On March 5, 2017, Bahrain's parliament approved the trial of civilians at military tribunals in a measure blasted by human rights campaigners as being tantamount to imposition of an undeclared martial law countrywide.

Bahraini monarch King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifah ratified the constitutional amendment on April 3 last year.

(source: abna24.com)








IRAN:

Urgent Action Update: Execution Looms for Iranian Kurdish Prisoner (UA: Iran 171.17)



Iranian Kurdish prisoner Ramin Hossein Panahi, sentenced to death in January 2018, is at imminent risk of execution. The Office for Implementation of Sentences has said that his execution will be carried out soon after the end of the Muslim month of Ramadan on 15 June. He was convicted and sentenced to death after a grossly unfair trial.

TAKE ACTION

Write a letter, send an email, call, fax or tweet:

Halt plans to carry out the execution of Ramin Hossein Panahi immediately;

Ensure that his conviction and death sentence are quashed and that he is released unless there is sufficient evidence not obtained through torture or other ill-treatment to charge him with a recognizable criminal offence and grant him a fair trial, without recourse to the death penalty;

Order a prompt, independent and impartial investigation into his enforced disappearance, prolonged solitary confinement and allegations of torture and other ill-treatment, bringing to justice anyone found responsible in fair trials.

Contact these 2 officials by 2 July, 2018:

High Council for Human Rights

Mohmmad Javad Larijani

Esfandiar Boulevard, Niayesh Intersection

Vali Asr Avenue, Tehran, Iran

Salutation: Your Excellency

H.E. Gholamali Khoshroo

Permanent Representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations

622 Third Avenue, 34th Floor

New York, NY 10017

Phone: (212) 687-2020 I Fax: (212) 867-7086

Email: i...@un.int

Salutation: Your Excellency

(source: Amnesty International LUSA)








SUDAN:

#JusticeForNoura: Will outcry overturn death penalty for Sudanese teen?----Activists urge Sudan to enact legal reform that would protect women and girls.



A 19-year-old Sudanese woman was sentenced to death by hanging for killing her husband after he allegedly raped her. Now, international groups including the UN are asking the Sudanese government to spare the life of Noura Hussein. Her story has generated outcry online and is being shared with the hashtag #JusticeForNoura.

Forced into marriage at 16, Noura Hussein rejected her husband and went into hiding for 3 years. Her father allegedly tricked her into returning home, and when she continued her refusal to consummate the marriage in April last year, her husband had male relatives hold her down while he raped her. When he tried to rape her again, Noura said she stabbed her husband in self-defence. In Sudan, marital rape and child marriage are not considered crimes.

Advocates for women's rights say Sudan's legal system often fails to protect the vulnerable and criminalises rape victims. In this episode, we'll discuss Noura's case and the challenges Sudanese women and girls face when seeking justice for sexual violence. Join the conversation at 1930GMT.

On this episode of The Stream, we speak with:

Mohamed Seifeldein @MoSeifeldein

International lawyer

moseif4council.com

Naitore Nyamu-Mathenge @NaitoreNyamu

Programme officer, Equality Now

equalitynow.org

Nahid Gabralla

Director, SEEMA Center

facebook.com/SEEMACenter

Hala al-Karib @Sihanet

Director, SIHA Network

(source: aljazeera.com)
_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to