On Samstag, 14. März 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > No, more explicit focus on collaborative hacking.
So what could be done to enable that during DebConf? Less events? More events
at the same time, thus freeing some slots? Neither (=accept it)? More days?
(10 instead of 7?)
Personally I feel that dedicating and alocating 2 weeks for DebCamp and
DebConf is a good compromise. The first week is slow, sometimes deep and
intense, the second week is (much more crowded and) fast(er), (sometimes
deep) and intense :-) Sometimes I happen to hack quite a lot at DebC???,
sometimes I do $adjective talks at $occasion, which somehow enable later
hacking.
Getting to know the (very) different persons behind the screens is why I enjoy
DebConf. I get more stuff done behind my screen, when I'm not at DebConf.
Of course I'm well aware that not everybody can take two weeks off - so I'd be
glad to hear how to improve DebConf! (Whether that means more collaboritive
hacking or foo bar is quite open, IMO+IME...)
Or to ask differently: what makes it, that DebConf is bad for collaborative
hacking? ;-) (=what could be better)
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
