Wookey <[email protected]> writes: > For any useful technical discussion (as opposed to presentations) a > longer session is needed (we could definitely do better at having > more engineering discussion and less presentation, (and I include > myself in that). It's one of the things UDS did better than debconf)
I agree with this. We should encourage more technical design discussions. What's currently holding up teams to have such discussions at Debconf? In my perception these nowdays mostly happen at dedicated sprints. I'm not sure if the lack of such sessions has to do with the conference format or if it's just that someone from a team has to sit down and propose something and this is currently too much work and most of these discussions happen in ad-hoc sessions or the "hallway track". Gaudenz _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
