On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:40:19PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:38:03PM +0100, Kevin Campbell wrote: > >On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:03:44PM +0100, Chris Halls wrote: > >> Phil had labelled all his larger pieces of equipment, and that made the > >> process much faster BTW. He had printed labels with hands.com, but it > >> would > >> have worked just as well if they had been e.g. sticky dots of a particular > >> colour. Maybe we should buy a pack of sticky dots of assorted colours for > >> the > >> next conf? > > > >We had three labelling machines. We should have made better use of them. > >It might have been an idea to have someone walk around the conf > >inspecting equipment - power supplies, cables, laptops, etc. and tagging > >any unlabelled equipment with the owner's id. > > We were picking up most of the big stuff, I thought. Maybe we just > needed to be even more stringent.
I expect so. I expect a lot of people had trouble with say rearranged hacklabs where laptops/power were left out. Delegates aren't going to expect that as an issue. Tagging _everything_ is going to make life easier for everyone. K _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
