On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:13:09PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > Agreed. Now, if getting "pre-scheduled" is the only benefit of having > a talks selection team, we could think about dropping the team and > just scheduling everything. After all, a relatively large group of us > rated the talks and selected the top among them — Shouldn't that be > rewarded somehow?
At some point in time (IMHO when DC 9 was running) there was a suggestion to publish the rating numbers in some way. I'd be in favour of this (but I'm not so terribly keen on it that I would volunteer to implement it :-)). > > Do we have explcitly-designated coordinators for these other tracks? If > > so, do they know that they're track coordinators? have they been given > > the privileges to mark events as belonging to their track, or at least a > > way for them to report and give feeback/suggestions? > > Well, this should be obvious by now — Andreas Tille and Rhonda, > respectively. I'd volunteer for the Blends track. I do not know if this has some technical implications in Penta. > Don't miss Thursday's meeting! :) Please publish (again) the exact date / time for people like me who have obviosely missed any previous announcement. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team