also sprach Ana Guerrero Lopez <[email protected]> [2014-08-18 15:15 +0200]: > Our reject message was meant to have the submitter coordinating > with the team to avoid duplicating topics. We rejected the talk > for the main schedule but we expected this to be schedule as > ad-hoc. I don't understand why the submitter waited one month to > discuss this since the reject messages were sent.
The submitter read the talks team rejection as just that, a rejection of the idea. He replied to your rejection on the next day, clarifying his plans, so as to prevent any misunderstanding. He has not received a reply. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[email protected]> @martinkrafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org DebConf15: Heidelberg, Germany: http://debconf15.debconf.org
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)
_______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
