On Fri, 13 Jun 2025, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-06-12 at 18:19 +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jun 2025, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2025-06-11 at 20:16 -0700, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > > > > > > > Fixing pthreads would probably go a long way. That's where we lost > > > > about half of our performance. > > > > > > This may be accurate, but I'm again not sure how this is related to > > > the discussion we're having. > > > > > > > It's related because such changes could impact all of the C libraries > > and compiler toolchains that you wish to port. So it's an example of a > > burden created by package archive growth. > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2025/06/msg00048.html > > m68k with 4 bytes alignment works fine on NetBSD. > Please read the messages you reply to. The topic was a regression. > > It's also related because such an enhancement may involve an ABI break. > > That's why I mentioned threading a week ago. > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2025/06/msg00018.html > > Which I don't care about because the current ABI is broken. > You should care! If you are going to get a new ABI, either you are going to do that work yourself or you'll have to collaborate with others who want certain characteristics from a new ABI. And here again, it appears that you never read the message you're replying to. (And here I am, making the spam problem worse by replying to it...)
