On Wed, 18 Jun 2025, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-06-18 at 13:19 +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > > > Do you know of a good solution for this open bug? > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30273 > > The proper solution would be to actually adhere to the official SVR4 ABI > when declaring elfosabi == GDB_OSABI_SVR4 and using GDB_OSABI_LINUX for > the old Linux ABI. > > This bug is another example why it was not a good idea to ignore the > official AT&T System V ABI ELF specification as it proves that > independent upstream projects look at the actual official specification > when implementing code. > I think what you meant to say was, "no". Interesting how, after a year or two of agitating and bloviating, you don't actually have a solution that would permit two co-existent m68k-linux ELF ABIs. I wonder what you real aim was?
