Hi, Carl Streeter wrote: > > Oh, sure. Stupid me. By the way - is anyone at master going to set up > > a cron job (or alike) that does the automatic creation of the Packages > > file for m68k? > > Yep. You should get a Packages file (and maybe Contents) tonight (or so). > I'll make sure that there are no errors with the auto generation. Having > duplicate packages killed us for a while in the i386 tree.
Ok, I understand there cannot yet be any Packages file without .changes files, but I hope this will change soon - as soon as the new dchanges allows us to create meaningful .changes files on our architecture. > Can someone check over the archive and make sure I didn't screw up anything > obvious, that there are no packages missing, etc? Just did so. There were a few mistakes/confusions: devel/libdb1-1.85.2-5.deb should go into ../base devel/libgxx-2.7.1-1.deb should be renamed to libg++27-2.7.1-1.deb ncurses stuff: I didn't follow the different parts of ncurses packages that were created in the last weeks, but the current condition under m68k/ is somewhat wrong (duplicates). I guess if someone of us just recompiles the current 1.9.8a-4 and uploads that, you could delete all current ncurses* things under base/, devel/ and misc/ at that time, before putting the new files in their place. /private/m68k/Incoming contains a duplicate info-3.6-5.deb that already is under doc/ - remove the former. mail/pico-2.5-1.deb : move this to ../editors (directory needs to be created) That's all I found at the moment. As I saw, you mixed together all archives, but that's ok for now. We'll have to recompile some of them in their newer form anyway, because the stuff Hartmut uploaded is a bit dated here and there. Thanks, Frank
