Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 16:28, Mario Lang wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi. >> >> Did anyone here get the version of gnopernicus in sid to talk? >> And I mean really talk, not just output the "Welcome to Gnopernicus" message? >> >> - From what I read on the gnome-accessibility-list, it seems recent >> changes in GNOME and in Gnopernicus should have increased the >> number of "speaking" widgets and programs dramatically. >> >> Just to make sure that I'm not totally missing something, I'd like >> to know if anyone got it talking in a useful way. >> >> Otherwise I think it would be great if Colin could do another cvs snapshot. > > Done. The speech at least has never really worked for me; it sounds > like it's coming out *way* too fast. I haven't had a chance to > investigate.
This is not really a bug, but a feature :-). Blinkies usually work with speech at that rate. Everything below is a pain to work with. I agree though that this should be somehow configurable in Gnopernicus, didn't find such a setting yet. > But with the just-uploaded packages, the magnifier seems to work better, > and I do get more speech (although it's still unintelligible :/)... What I observed today is that when I tried to launch nautilus, it complained that the libgail-gnome module was not installed. After checking, I saw that it was really not installed. Well, unfortunately, I realized that I still had your hacked libatk1.0-1 packages, and did a cleanup. After that, strangely, nautilus no longer complains about a missing libgail-gnome module. I'm wondering now, should gnopernicus depend on libgail-gnome-module, or is this just an ancient left-over? > Let me know how they work out for you guys. I'm using gnopernicus 0.3.2 now (which is available from ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/gnopernicus/0.3/ as tarball. I'm not sure if 0.3.2 is that good, or if only the setting of the accessibility gconf key was the reason, but if you find time, maybe you could do a new upload of 0.3.2? OTOH, if you want to get rid of gnopernicus, I *think* I *might* be able to aadopt it now. At least the build of 0.3.2 with your debian/ dir went fine without any problems :) -- CYa, Mario | Debian Developer <URL:http://debian.org/> | Get my public key via finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 1024D/7FC1A0854909BCCDBE6C102DDFFC022A6B113E44
