Hello, Ильяс Гасанов, le Sat 16 Aug 2014 00:52:58 +0400, a écrit : > Aren't there other options considerable - like, making qt-at-spi package > itself not depend on qt4 libs? [...] > I guess the same could be stated about at-spi2-core dependences on > glib/gtk packages.
I had discussed about such kind of things with the maintainer of at-spi1 in the past, and the answer was a clear "come on, it's really small dependencies by nowadays' standards, and not using them would mean reimplementing convenience functions such as utf-8 handling, list handling, etc.". So this is mostly a no-go. > Personally I can't imagine any way in which it could actually be used > without having any qt applications to launch. Sure, but python-pyatspi can't know whether there are some qt applications or not. > However, when an average user installs said software, these libs would > automatically be fetched and installed aside. Kind of a dirty hack, > but it seems fine at least from my perspective. Again, what is the *actual* gain of introducing such hack? Saving 25MiB worth of disk space, really? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-accessibility-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140818234912.gu8...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
