Hi! I'm sure you haven't seen anything such as this before, this is something really great, please take a peek http://tecniquimica.es/ill_n.php?6160
Warmest regards, Release Managers From: liblouisxml [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:58 AM To: [email protected] Subject: That was a fun movie. If you are correct and a continuous program isn't possible, you can likely get around the 1second restriction by, instead of using a timer block, use another computer core which in turn restarts the first one. I imagine this will happen pretty much instantaneously, as opposed to timers. Edit: In case I was unclear: End your program with a call to run the second programmable block, which in turn just runs the first one again. Should be much faster than timers. Sent from Mail for Windows 10
