Hello, Paul Gevers, on ven. 15 déc. 2017 10:32:39 +0100, wrote: > Additional question. Does anybody mind moving speech-dispatcher-contrib > to non-free? Albeit being philosophically wrong,
It's actually arguably non-wrong, in the sense that speech-dispatcher-contrib doesn't actually provide anything but a way to use non-free software. Which means I'm fine with the move :) > the point is that in non-free, packages can be white listed to be > auto-build, while packages in contrib need manual building and > uploading. Perhaps that's also a point that should be fixed? I don't see why non-free could be auto-built and contrib can't. Samuel