xavier grave writes: > Le 06/05/2012 18:36, Reto Buerki a écrit : >> On 05/05/2012 10:16 PM, Xavier Grave wrote: >>> My main problem is that the following tests in the testsuite are not >>> running as expected (see the attached polyorb_2.8~20110207-1_amd64.build >>> file) : >>> always_fail CORBA_PORTABLEINTERCEPTOR_1 SHUTDOWN_1 ALL_TYPES_2 >>> ALL_TYPES_3 ALL_FUNCTIONS_3 ALL_FUNCTIONS_2 >>> >>> Since the problem seems to me mainly related to corba, and I'm not using >>> this part of the lib : I'm launching this RFH to understand why these >>> corba tests are failing. >> >> I'm going to look into it. > > Thanks a lot. > >>> I also wonder which Debian packages depend on the corba part of polyorb >>> and if we can think about a "DSA only" polyorb package or providing the >>> package as it is removing these tests from the test suite and continue >>> to work in parallel on the solution of this problem. >> >> Currently no other Debian packages depend on the corba part of polyorb. >> Nevertheless, I would prefer to have corba enabled in the next release >> because I put quite a lot of effort into it already. > > I'll keep that in mind. > >> One thing that bothers me is that the build continues even though some >> tests are failing. 'make testsuite' should return non-zero exit status >> when tests fail. > > I have already put my nose in the testsuite.py python code (not easy for > me :) ), I'll try to make it exit to non zero when a test fail.
The freeze of Debian 7 "Wheezy" is nigh[1]. Please upload polyorb without CORBA support quickly (and narval thereafter) and fix CORBA later as time permits. I agree that it would be a shame to lose CORBA support but it would be even worse to lose all of polyorb and narval due to not uploading in time for the freeze. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/05/msg00004.html -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
