On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:11:00 +0100, Ludovic Brenta wrote:
Xavier Grave wrote:
At least, rev 79d029250b63dd2118188370321ab18cd61eb041 of
org.debian.polyorb produces usable (from a DSA point of view) code.
Glad to hear that. Congratulations.
How do I close #701338 ? One line explaining that polyorb build
depends on gcc-4.9 is enough ?
Unless I misunderstand, the fix for this bug is to patch PolyORB's
configure and support/idlcpp.m4 files; this does not depend on a
particular compiler. Pavel said his patch was accepted upstream; I
interpret this as "PolyORB upstream" but, again, I may be entirely
wrong.
I'm the one to be wrong, after a look at com.adacore.polyorb rev
7789afb4f31d180cf417c7997d3c11bf0fec3a62
I have checked that upstream fixed the bug, you are right. The
packaging branch com.adacore.polyorb.debian is based on this revision.
Do we upload to experimental 2.11~20140128-1 in order people can
play with it as soon as possible ?
It is always preferable to close a bug from the changelog of PolyORB,
as part of an upload. And of course, free software works best when
developers "release early, release often" :)
The changelog should say something like:
* new upstream version (details...). Closes: #701338.
I'll update it as soon as possible and it will be part of the next
commit containing the new license scheme.
xavier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
