On 26/05/16 12:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-6.html > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Cc'ing debian-ada@. > > On 25/05/16 15:12, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: [email protected] >> Usertags: transition >> >> The upload of gnat (6) about a month ago started the transition from >> gnat-4.9 to gnat-6. This deserves a tracker. >> >> Below is my attempt on a ben file, not sure whether it covers the right >> things. I just analyzed some uninstallability discovered by piuparts. >> There are packages that >> (Build-)Depends: gnat, gnat-4.9, ... >> but gnat now Depends: gnat-6 and gnat-6 has Conflicts: gnat-4.9 >> These probably need sourceful uploads instead of binNMUs. > > Everything needs a sourceful upload, per the ada policy (as they rename the > -dev packages). > >> title = "gnat-6"; >> is_affected = .depends ~ /gnat-/ | .build-depends ~ /gnat-/; >> is_good = .depends ~ "gnat-6" | .build-depends ~ "gnat-6"; >> is_bad = .depends ~ "gnat-4.9" | .build-depends ~ "gnat-4.9"; > > I have added a tracker at > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-6.html > > Why not include gnat-5 in is_bad? > > @ada people: is this useful to you? Are there any changes I could make to > make it better? > > Hopefully this helps make the transition shorter.
I removed libxmlezout and aged adacontrol. With that and some decrufts, the transition went in. Cheers, Emilio
