Hello. The transition to gnat-10 is now completed.
By the way, here is a message by the release team member who has managed this transition. As far as I can tell, gnat (>= 10), gnat (<< 11), could very well replace gnat, gnat-10, in the Ada Policy for libraries if this is more practical for the release team. What do you think? ----- Forwarded message from Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> ----- I've added hints so that gnat and the reverse dependencies are able to migrate. Note though, that the unversioned gnat dependency in the reverse dependencies causes issues. britney has hard time to detect that the whole stack has to migrate at once. Consequently, gnat caused autopkgtest failures in all its reverse depedencies - the tests were tried with the builds for gnat 10 but with gnat 9 from testing. For the future, please ensure with appropriate dependencies that this does not happen again. I think gnat (>= X), gnat (<< X+1) (similarly to what's done for Python packages) would be enough to help britney and the autopkgtests.
