Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Mitch Blevins wrote: > > I just think we can accomodate the needs of the multi-machine clusterer's > > without adding alot of complexity to the tools used by everyone else. > > But making a filesystem appear to change while in reality it doesn't > is not the solutition here. I still think the only way to do this > properly is make the maintainer scripts check this.
I trust your judgement on this, and won't push it. I just cringe at the thought of more requirements for new maintainer scripts. (check a config option before modifying any file) -Mitch