On Thu, 8 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In my unprofessional opinion, I would say that it should be increased. > Under any load openldap might as well not work with this as a problem. > There was a stable release on 5/15 and this bug has been around for longer > then that, so it seems as if it has be disregarded. I'm not sure how this > works when the problem seems to be upstream though.
It has been upgraded and I believe David is sending a note to the maintainer with an offer to NMU it (my recommendation). I'm recompiling it now and will forward a URL to fetch the new packages when I'm done. > I'm not sure what release of 1.2.10 the patch was created from, but it > doesn't seem to apply to the latest stable or release, so I have not been > able to test it. This leaves me in kind of an awkward position. =P > Suggestions? I just tested it and David is correct (as is the patch). You'll have new debs in the next 30 mins :-) C
