> > what do you recommend: Using the lffm of Joachim Wesener or the > > Compaq compilers to increase calculation speed of > > "home-compiled" programs (21164a, potato)?
> Both do well, but I'd personally prefer the Compaq CPML library. It's > faster in most cases, and provides for more functions (and > exceptions) than libffm. I maintain the libffm debs, so those are > available for use, in case you wanted to keep it "free" though. > C I think the Compaq libraries are more robust and give higer accuracy. rgh
