"Christopher C. Chimelis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The library libc-2.2.1.so does not contain the symbol lstat, but does >> define the symbols __lxstat and __lxstat64, as suggested by the header >> file. I'm not sure exactly what's going on here, but clearly >> something is wrong. It looks like it might be related to the large >> file (>4GB) support in glibc-2.2. > >xfig may need a recompile. I'll try to test this tonight to find out.
This was with regard to libgtk1.2; that's what you meant to say, right? >> xdm_4.0.2-1 >> >> Finally, xdm itself takes about five minutes to start up, again on a >> 275MHz PC64. This is independent of the xconsole problem mentioned >> above. I know that the problem is not with the X-server, because >> startx brings it up much faster. Something must be wrong; the xdm log >> file is no help, because it's just a condensed version of the X-server >> log. There doesn't appear to be any xdm-specific information in it; >> perhaps this is a clue. > >That's very odd. xdm starts right up on my SX and even faster on my >UP2k at work. Granted, I haven't tried it out since 4.0.2-1, but it >worked very well then. Initial load time may be killing you, though. >Is xdm being started at boot time or is this from the command line >after boot? Either way, same result. Using startx, on the other hand, the X-server comes up in less than a minute. The X-server log reveals lots of modules being loaded; this is the initial load time I'd be worried about. It doesn't seem reasonable that xdm should take so much longer than this. Update: I just tried it again, and xdm actually takes 3-1/2 minutes to bring up the X-server, and during this time it's eating 98% of the CPU. Try this: # /etc/init.d/xdm start ; top Then you can watch the CPU utilization until the video mode changes; better yet, do it through a telnet session. I bet that your machines are doing the same thing as mine, only faster. Ian Bruce ____________________________________________________________________ Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1