Today, my alpha installed Debian libc6.1-2.13-11, I will try to revert udev to the original and remove the package hold here.
I will tell if it works! Uwe ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 5:47 PM > To: 'Bob Tracy' > Cc: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org; linux-al...@vger.kernel.org; > matts...@gmail.com; mc...@orcon.net.nz > Subject: RE: recent udev upgrade failure on alpha > > Hi Bob, > > > > (...) > > > I tried then to upgrade the package "udev" (was on hold, to prevent > > > me from making system unbootable), with the hope that the inotify is > > > working with this debian kernel. Unfortunately that's not the case, > > > UDEV complains about missing inotify. > > > > > > So is the patch below already included in some kernel images > > > available? Or does somebody have a recent udev version as .deb > > packages? > > > > I still have (and am using) my modified "udev" package > > (udev_166-1_alpha.deb: includes the patch you quoted in your original > > message). I can send it your way if you wish. In truth, the only > > thing > you > > need is "/sbin/udevd" from that package to be operational, and I can > > send you just that piece if you prefer. Just let me know. > > A patch for udev would be the best (do you have it available as a patch), then I > can build a custom udev whenever an update occurs. Do you have it > somewhere on the web/dropbox whatever? But /sbin/udev is also a good > choice for now. Maybe send both as attachment to my private mail. THANKS! > > >From http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614099 it seems > >that > this is fixed in glibc 2.13-1, unfortunately on debian-ports is only 2.11.2-13. So > we have to wait until buildds are working :( Maybe I try to compile the libc > package (hours of waiting included...) > > > The underlying problem isn't anything missing in the kernel (at least > > when built from the mainline kernel.org source): inotify_init1() is > > definitely > there. > > The problem is the userspace call to inotify_init1() in the current > > Alpha version of libc6.1 is a stub function. I elected to rebuild the "udev" > package > > with a valid workaround rather than risk modifying and having to debug > "libc" > > :-). > > I was confused about the whole discussion, thanks for making it clear. > > Uwe > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/00cd01cc4306$6269fe00$273dfa00$@thetaphi.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/007701cc5b6e$092c7360$1b855a20$@thetaphi.de
