Steven Chamberlain dixit: >On 05/09/14 18:39, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal* >> mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it [...] > >That sounds perfect IMHO. It could be used for general discussion about >porting, upcoming new ports, or any ports that don't quite merit having >their own mailing list yet.
Agreed, all that plus the dpo infrastructure, buildd and wanna-build related setup (possibly for both dpo and the main archive), etc. >> "debian-cross-ports" or "debian-architectures" or something. > >I'd prefer not to have it, or have to sign up to it as a porter. It'd >probably get more spam than useful mail. Agree. >I can't think of a reason to mail *all* ports that wouldn't be >appropriate for debian-devel-announce; or if your mail only concerns a >few ports it should be convenient to cross-post to the relevant ports' >lists only. Fully agree. bye, //mirabilos -- <gcc> ncal.c: In function 'parsemonth': warning: comparison between pointer and integer • <mirabilos> ↑ hab da „in function parselmouth“ gelesen <Natureshadow> ICH AUCH! • <Natureshadow> Ich hab gerade gedacht "Häh? Wie, hab da parselmouth gelesen ... steht da doch auch :o?" -- too much fanfic… -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-alpha-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1409051936000.7...@herc.mirbsd.org
