Benjamin Kaduk <ka...@mit.edu> writes: > Somehow I thought that porterbox access was annoying to get for a > non-DD DM (such as myself).
Per [1], you should be able to request access through nm.d.o. In my experience sponsoring access requests for non-DMs, DSA has been happy to honor reasonable requests, but can take a little while to get to them; I don't know how the DM experience looks here. That said, I don't see an alpha porter box (or any alpha systems at all!) on [2], and alpha-porterbox.debian.net doesn't respond to pings, let alone ssh attempts. Perhaps an official porter can help you out here; copying debian-alpha accordingly. > The rx event subsystem got a lot of attention before 1.8.0pre3 (and > was failing tests on some release architectures previously), but we > thought it was supposed to be in good shape; it's surprising to see > that there is still a test failure. (I have no idea about the > rx/perf issue.) For all I know, these could both be intermittent glitches, but tests should of course reliably succeed. > I supsect it will be hard to make progress on this without the > involvement of someone with porterbox (or other box) access... [1] https://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/ [2] https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?sortby=architecture&sortorder=asc -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu