Hi, Le mercredi 01 avril 2020 à 16:43 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit : > On 3/16/20 1:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > sbcl has partial support for alpha, hppa, mips*, ppc64 and riscv64 > > and if we try to build sbcl on any architecture using clisp, we will > > be able to provide upstream with a build log of sbcl on any architecture > > that might be supported in the future (like ppc64 and riscv64) or > > was previously supported and is currently broken (like alpha and hppa). > > > > The attached patch enables building with clisp on all unsupported > > architectures. > > Any chance we can get this implemented for the next upload? > > FWIW, sbcl builds fine for me on mipsel if clang is used as the C compiler, > I'll file a separate bug report for that.
I have mixed feelings about this. I am worried by the fact that those architectures are not really supported upstream. Hence, if by chance we manage to compile SBCL on one of those mostly-unsupported archs, I don’t know how we would be able to deal with regressions that could appear in the future, and that would block testing migration for supported archs. What’s your view on this? Best, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
