Hello Rene,

On 23.06.20 12:33, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
> Am 23. Juni 2020 12:05:18 MESZ schrieb Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de>:
>> I'm one of the maintainers for the hppa/parisc architecture....
>
> Which didn't build since 2018. And is constantly bd-uninststallable.

If you apply Adrian's patch which drops dependency on clang,
then it maybe get's bd-installable again?


>> On 19.06.20 19:12, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> Am 19.06.20 um 17:46 schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz:
>>>> On 6/19/20 1:08 PM, r...@rene-engelhard.de wrote:
>>>>> Am 19. Juni 2020 12:52:40 MESZ schrieb John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
>> <glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de>:
>>>> I have honestly no clue why you would deny porters to build
>> LibreOffice on non-release
>>>> architectures given these circumstances.
>>>
>>> It is. That line needs to be maintained.
>>
>> Sure does it needs to be maintained.
>> And for that reason it's important to get libreoffice built on the
>> non-release architectures.
>
> No, why?

It's a chain of package dependecies. If one fails, all other behind that
package fail too.

> And please maintain your port wrt installabity of packages before me accusing 
> of not caring, thanks.

For that we need your help.
E.g. there is no plan to support clang on hppa.

>>> Ah, right, so you fix the stuff?
>>>
>>> - alpha broken for ages
>>> - hppa broken for ages
>>> - sparc64 BD-Unistallable for ages due to KDE
>>> - kfreebsd-* BD-Uninstallable for ages
>>
>>> See  https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libreoffice
>> (sid).
>>
>> Yes, I'm sure Adrian will fix lots of issues in libreoffice for those
>> architectures
>
> I am not.

That's ok.
You don't need to, unless you want to.
The ask is, that you accept correct patches if they don't hurt you.

> You haven't even remotely looked at the link did you? Look at how long alpha 
> is broken?

Does it matter?
There are people who want to fix things and need your help.

>> He did in the past together with the ports maintainers.
>> Speaking for hppa, libreoffice was fixed in 2017, then cleanly compiled
>> until 2018:
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=libreoffice&arch=hppa
>
> Wow, 2018. We are mid-2020.
>
> I know he contributed patches for some Arch's (e.g. m68k), that does not 
> change e.g. the alpha situation.

Adrian contributes a LOT for all non-ports architectures.
Patches for m68k often fix other ports too.

>> [...]
>>
>>>> Would it be okay if I send a pull request to make the necessary
>> changes?
>>>
>>> I am perfectly able to implement what you want. But whatever.
>>> You can send any pull request.
>>> That doesn't mean I'll merge it.
>>
>> It would be really nice and helpful for the debian-ports platforms if
>> you would
>> merge those, unless they break the release architectures.
>
> Why do I need to be helpful to dead architectures unless it's a LO issue?
> It is not a new architecture where I could understand this until it's 
> up-to-date - it's dead ones.

Because some people still do care.
If it doesn't hurt you, why should you worry?

Helge

Reply via email to