Hi guys,
On 13.12.22 06:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
[...]
I am still interested in fixing the glibc bug and will work on bisecting
it.
I yestderday did give that a try on a DS15, but it took already hours to
get glibc 2.33 compiled.
During this compilation I got 4 segfaults from the compiler (gcc-12) and
a "gcc: internal compiler error: Aborted signal terminated program cc1".
If you are interested in the details, I have all the error messages
available.
This went on during `make test` with another segfault and this one here
after more than 2 hours of processing:
```
root@ds15:/srv/storage/build/glibc-2.33# time make test
[...]
g++ tst-thread_local1.cc -c -I/srv/storage/build/glibc-2.33/ -g -O2
-Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wundef -fmerge-all-constants -frounding-math
-fno-stack-protector -mlong-double-128 -mieee -mfp-rounding-mode=d
-std=gnu++11 -I../include -I/srv/storage/build/glibc-2.33/nptl
-I/srv/storage/build/glibc-2.33 -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha/fpu
-I../sysdeps/alpha/fpu -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha
-I../sysdeps/alpha/nptl -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/wordsize-64
-I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-64-128 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-opt
-I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/include -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux
-I../sysdeps/nptl -I../sysdeps/pthread -I../sysdeps/gnu
-I../sysdeps/unix/inet -I../sysdeps/unix/sysv -I../sysdeps/unix/alpha
-I../sysdeps/unix -I../sysdeps/posix -I../sysdeps/alpha
-I../sysdeps/wordsize-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-128
-I../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64 -I../sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32
-I../sysdeps/ieee754 -I../sysdeps/generic -I.. -I../libio -I.
-D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include /srv/storage/build/glibc-2.33/libc-modules.h
-DMODULE_NAME=testsuite -include ../include/libc-symbols.h
-DTOP_NAMESPACE=glibc -o
/srv/storage/build/glibc-2.33/nptl/tst-thread_local1.o -MD -MP -MF
/srv/storage/build/glibc-2.33/nptl/tst-thread_local1.o.dt -MT
/srv/storage/build/glibc-2.33/nptl/tst-thread_local1.o
tst-thread_local1.cc: In function ‘int do_test()’:
tst-thread_local1.cc:177:5: error: variable ‘std::array<std::pair<const
char*, std::function<void(void* (*)(void*))> >, 2> do_thread_X’ has
initializer but incomplete type
177 | do_thread_X
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
tst-thread_local1.cc: At global scope:
tst-thread_local1.cc:133:1: warning: ‘void* thread_with_access(void*)’
defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
133 | thread_with_access (void *)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
tst-thread_local1.cc:127:1: warning: ‘void*
thread_without_access(void*)’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
127 | thread_without_access (void *)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[2]: *** [../o-iterator.mk:9:
/srv/storage/build/glibc-2.33/nptl/tst-thread_local1.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/srv/storage/glibc/nptl'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:479: nptl/tests] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/srv/storage/glibc'
make: *** [Makefile:9: check] Error 2
real 129m3.940s
user 104m25.441s
sys 11m36.611s
```
...after which I stopped. I did use `--disable-werror` during the
configure step, but maybe this is not enough. OTOH it's only a warning
so why does it err? Ah, I see it `-Wundef` is set. I'll have a look what
the buildds use for the configure step.
Today I'll also give it another try, but with gcc-11 this time - just in
case something is wrong with gcc-12 - but frankly I don't think this
goes anywhere on the DS15:
Even with a DS25 I have available here I can only speed up the
compilation and it takes already more than twice the power of the DS15,
so nothing gained. My ES45s are in cold storage and I don't dare to
start them up in such a low temperature environment.
Summarizing it, I'd be grateful if someone could do the bisecting on one
of the buildds or developer machines.
Cheers,
Frank
