Per Bojsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *** Regarding Re: Problem with /lib64 in libc6
> 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.gcc4; Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> adds:
>
> Frederik> The --force-overwrite switch should only be used as last
> Frederik> resort, and not to "fix" a temporary bug.
>
> Agreed, and that's why I think it is a good idea if a warning is
> issued on the mailing list in those rare cases when this is going to
> be needed to do an upgrade.
There was :) at least for pure64.
But be happy, the overwrite problem on gcc-3.4 is better than the
announced change for pure64 and the screwup we had where /lib64 went
missing completly for some people.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
