On Dec 15, Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Same problems here with udev 0.048-2 on pure64
> It's documented in BTS #285281
> I personally think it should be labeled grave. 
No, because the amd64 port does not officially exist.
I forwarded the bug upstream, but if you want to see it fixed quickly
please send a patch... I have no time to investigate it right now.

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [9808 se1hKqdUZ.DMA]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to