On Dec 15, Daniel van Eeden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Same problems here with udev 0.048-2 on pure64 > It's documented in BTS #285281 > I personally think it should be labeled grave. No, because the amd64 port does not officially exist. I forwarded the bug upstream, but if you want to see it fixed quickly please send a patch... I have no time to investigate it right now.
-- ciao, | Marco | [9808 se1hKqdUZ.DMA]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature