On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Not adding pure64 at all is not very suitable for much more of our > users than those two or three who want to run non-DFSG-free software,
Do you have any reliable statistics ? And this is not only a non-DFSG issue. 32-64 bit migration has many drawbacks, and is not something that most administrators will do directly. You can't migrate a regular production server on 64 bit in one step. Oh, do you remember the Itanium fiasco and its "pure 64 bit" architecture?
