Hi James, > given that a go now... unfortunately failed build.
Unfortunately, that's what life on the bleeding edge of kernel development can be like... > Here is the bits I think are relevant to it failing: > > CC kernel/rt.o > CC kernel/latency.o > kernel/latency.c: In function `__trace_start_sched_wakeup': > kernel/latency.c:1421: warning: implicit declaration of function > `_trace_cmdline' It does look as if the build failure is related to Ingo's patches. Next month I will be embarking on a project which will provide a ready made low-latency 2.6.x kernel for pure 64-based Debian systems. I'll post to this list as soon as something is available, of course. Cheers Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
