That is clear.Hallo Alex,
El sÃb, 09-04-2005 a las 01:39 +0200, Alexander Nagel escribiÃ:
When i use deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free
redkeep:/home/alex# apt-get install -V libgtk2.0-dev
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
AbhÃngigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig
Die folgenden zusÃtzlichen Pakete werden installiert:
libatk1.0-dev (1.8.0-4)
libexpat1-dev (1.95.8-1)
libfontconfig1-dev (2.3.1-2)
libfreetype6-dev (2.1.7-2.3)
libglib2.0-0 (2.6.4-1)
libglib2.0-dev (2.6.4-1)
libgtk2.0-0 (2.6.4-1)
libgtk2.0-bin (2.6.4-1)
libgtk2.0-common (2.6.4-1)
libpango1.0-dev (1.8.1-1)
libx11-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
libxext-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
libxft-dev (2.1.7-1)
libxft2 (2.1.7-1)
libxi-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
libxrender-dev (0.8.3-7)
libxv-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
render-dev (0.8-4)
x-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
xlibs-static-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
zlib1g-dev (1.2.2-4)
Vorgeschlagene Pakete:
xspecs (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
Empfohlene Pakete:
libglib2.0-data (2.6.4-1)
Die folgenden NEUEN Pakete werden installiert:
libatk1.0-dev (1.8.0-4)
libexpat1-dev (1.95.8-1)
libfontconfig1-dev (2.3.1-2)
libfreetype6-dev (2.1.7-2.3)
libglib2.0-dev (2.6.4-1)
libgtk2.0-dev (2.6.4-1)
libpango1.0-dev (1.8.1-1)
libx11-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
libxext-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
libxft-dev (2.1.7-1)
libxi-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
libxrender-dev (0.8.3-7)
libxv-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
render-dev (0.8-4)
x-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
xlibs-static-dev (4.3.0.dfsg.1-12)
zlib1g-dev (1.2.2-4)
Die folgenden Pakete werden aktualisiert:
libglib2.0-0 (2.6.3-1 => 2.6.4-1)
libgtk2.0-0 (2.6.2-4 => 2.6.4-1)
libgtk2.0-bin (2.6.2-4 => 2.6.4-1)
libgtk2.0-common (2.6.2-4 => 2.6.4-1)
libxft2 (2.1.2-6 => 2.1.7-1)
5 aktualisiert, 17 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 141 nicht aktualisiert.
Es mÃssen 19,4MB Archive geholt werden.
Nach dem Auspacken werden 66,2MB Plattenplatz zusÃtzlich benutzt.
MÃchten Sie fortfahren? [J/n]
it seems to work but with lot's of new packages. Why are there so much differences?? Two different sarge or is the second sid??
Sorry that I cannot advice you about the first part of the mail, with the missing packages, but the second part is alright. What's going on there is that you're trying to install a development package that depends on X, therefore it brings all the X development packages as well, and that means dozens of packages.
But
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge main contrib non-free
is mentioned in the FAQ so it's some kind official
and therefore these packages seems to be broken.
And the other adress:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free
seems to work but wants to install newer packages which are in SID (IMHO).
Greets
Alex
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
