On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 23:21 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > And yet another person that hasn't been reading the ML for the last > half year. Go fish.
I know I'm ignorant and I screwed up, that much is obvious. But can I at least tell you what this looked like from my perspective? Is there any info on this move, this problem, anywhere other than this mailing list? I wasn't able to find it. Your HOWTO isn't up to date. Your debian.org port page had some current info but nothing about this problem. Mailing lists are a disorganized, unreliable way to convey information. I've been on the list for a while, but I'm not an expert like you and I don't always understand everything or its relevance. I also re-read the archives before I asked my question, and I said so ("I saw some traffic on the list that looked similar"). Searching on libc gives a lot of hits that don't all immediately seem clear. http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/05/msg00151.html This seems similar, but not quite the same problem. This looks closer: http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/04/msg00238.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/04/msg00242.html OK, I'm guessing you guys tweaked the version numbering during the move? So I think I need to force myself to a different version of base-files and libc. Hey, I wonder what will happen if I'm wrong and I mess this up? Why don't I ask, just to be sure. And for this, I get the response above. You probably think I don't know what it's like to be in your shoes and do a lot of work for nothing and have to answer stupid questions all the time. You're wrong. I know what it's like. But do you know what it feels like to try to use pure64 right now? Regards, -David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]