On 5/13/05, Kaare Hviid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wasn't aware that you had done a proper audit of the licenses when > I embarked on looking at it. Once finished, I found your mail, and > rather than throwing away my own list, I replied you, thinking someone > might want a second opinion. I have also read each of the dreaded > debian/copyright files, (which nonfree.alioth.debian.org links to) and > have tried to find further information when it was lacking. Our > findings match up pretty good anyway, with the exception of libforms-doc > (that I find clearly non-distributable), and moria and trn4 (where I > didn't find anything compelling hindering distribution).
libforms-doc doesn't seem to be distributable... I better move that to bad.txt... fast :) For moria, I found this, "Moria may be copied and modified freely, but may not be sold or marketed IN ANY FORM" I don't know what "marketed IN ANY FORM" refers to. To me, any form of advertising is "marketed". Amd64 "advertised" on Debian mailing lists and such. I didn't feel comfortable. Lastly for trn4, no debian/*copyright file(s) I could extract. But I'm glad our independent findings matched up (on the conservative side) with the exception of my libforms-doc blunder. - Adam