On Friday 13 May 2005 23:21, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> > Looks like the bind9-host package is sticky...
>
> Or has two different sources.
>
> > grover:/home/ed# aptitude update
> > ...
> > grover:/home/ed# aptitude upgrade
> > ...
> > The following packages will be upgraded:
> > bind9-host
> > ...
> > grover:/home/ed# aptitude upgrade
> > ...
> > The following packages will be upgraded:
> > bind9-host
> > ...
> >
> > Notice that it still thinks bind9-host needs to be installed. How
> > do I find out why? Alternately, how do I fix it?
>
> What is the output of this command?
>
> apt-cache policy bind9-host
>
> I am guessing that there are multiple sources for bind9-host. They
> are different. You are alternately installing first one and then the
> other. I have seen this behavior from apt with other packages with
> that problem. A local rebuild in a local depot was my problem.
>
> What is the output of this command?
>
> apt-get install --print-uris -d -y -qq bind9-host |awk '{print$1}' |xargs -l
>
> I am guessing that as you install first one and then the other that
> the URL printed will be changing from one location to the next.
Bob,
grover:/home/ed# apt-cache policy bind9-host
bind9-host:
Installed: 1:9.3.1-2
Candidate: 1:9.3.1-2
Version Table:
1:9.3.1-2 0
500 http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Packages
*** 1:9.3.1-2 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
grover:/home/ed# apt-get install --print-uris -d -y -qq bind9-host |awk
'{print$1}' |xargs -l
http://amd64.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bind9/bind9-host_9.3.1-2_amd64.deb
grover:/home/ed#
Which seems to show one url? Wonder if its worth removing the cached version?
Thanks
Ed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
