David Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Hugo Mills wrote:
>
>> They're not (directly) the way that the Debian multiarch is most
>> likely to go. Unfortunately, the relevant site seems to be down, but
>> take a look at [1], and possibly some of the other (Google cached)
>> files in [2].
>
> Just out of curiosity; does anyone know what was wrong with the
> way documented in:
>
> http://www.linuxbase.org/futures/ideas/multiarch/
Afaik that is completly based on and in sync with our multiarch
proposal and exactly what we want to achive.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
