On 23 Jul 2005, antongiulio05 wrote: > > > cdrecord dev=help returns: > > > cdrecord: Warning: Running on Linux-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8 > > > cdrecord: There are unsettled issues with Linux-2.5 and newer. > > > cdrecord: If you have unexpected problems, please try Linux-2.4 or > > > Solaris. > > > Supported SCSI transports for this platform: > > I have downgraded udev version: 0.063-1 -> 0.056-3 and mantained same kernel > version 2.6.11-9. However problem remains again: no permissions on /dev/sg0. > Have you any idea???
I'd have to go with a previous suggestion at this point. You might consider dumping udev entirely for the time being until it stabilizes in lieu of a static /dev. While udev and devfs are both nice ideas and it would be nice to have a /dev with only the actual hardware attached to your system present as entries, I rarely, if ever, have problems with a static /dev despite the absurd overkill of device entries present. So yeah, wait a bit and try udev (or devfs, if it does in fact make a comeback) at a later time. -- Mark Nipper e-contacts: 4475 Carter Creek Parkway [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apartment 724 http://nipsy.bitgnome.net/ Bryan, Texas, 77802-4481 AIM/Yahoo: texasnipsy ICQ: 66971617 (979)575-3193 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GG/IT d- s++:+ a- C++$ UBL++++$ P--->+++ L+++$ !E--- W++(--) N+ o K++ w(---) O++ M V(--) PS+++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP t+ 5 X R tv b+++@ DI+(++) D+ G e h r++ y+(**) ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---begin random quote of the moment--- "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall, _The Friends of Voltaire_, 1906 ----end random quote of the moment---- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]