On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:13:10AM +0900, ????????? wrote: > A few weeks ago, I have been done some benchmark with areca and 3ware9500. > I used my own benchmark program which issue sequeuntil read and write > request. > > Result ::: > > 1 ~ 10 client : roughly areca is better than 3ware about 15%. > 10 ~20 client : almost same. > 20 ~ client : 3ware performance is stable, but areca is not draw stable > performance graph. > I think that areca raid driver is not matured
That's right, the Areca driver needs work (Christoph Hellwig pointed out some issues), but Andrew Morton already put it in the -mm tree so it gets testing. > Test Environment ::: > kernel 2.4.27 stock > 2.6.12 stock I hope you didn't compare a 2.4.27 3ware kernel against a 2.6.12 areca kernel, cause in that case you're also comparing the networking, nfs, xfs, and block level code. Erik -- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]