On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:50:08AM -0700, Zachary Rizer wrote: > I'm unaware of this LD_ASSUME_KERNEL 'thingy', what is > it? > > And, to the other comment about libc being 'too new' > or 'too old' is there a way to figure out which it is, > and how to fix it?
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/assumekernel.html It tells libc that this application is 'broken' and did things it wasn't supposed to and to please emmulate the 'broken' behaviour this application relies on. Doing a search for LD_ASSUME_KERNEL and quake, I found a message suggesting doing: bash# LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 quake3program Apparently it doesn't get along with native posix threads. Of course if it is released as open source by now, then you could probably just recompile it and solve the problem that way. Or fix it and recompile it if it really was a bug in the code. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]