Yes, it was compiled OK. However, because make was from root, the property of all compiled *.o files is root root. This makes some problems in the use of the program, such as in deleting files.
Issuing ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-41 /usr/local/bin/gcc either as $ or #, followed by $ make reports gcc -g -02 -c -o active.o active.c cc1: error: active.c: Permission denied make: *** [active.o] Error 1 Perhaps, unless link/make can be arranged differently, the easiest would be to change the property of all *.o files. Don'y remember how this could be done with a single command. Incidentally, in previous compilation the proprty of *.c files was francesco francesco. Now it is 500 500; I imagine that 500 stands for francesco. True? You know, when such affaris are carried out sporadically, memory about tends to vanish to make room to other storage. francesco pietra Therefore, I have recreated directory gmmx with sources (I had deleted all) and recompiled issuing both links and make as root. Now the *. files are 500 500 property (I imagine it is for owner francesco) while *.o files are root root. Why not changing the property? I was too tired yesterday. Now tried. Perhaps mistakenly, I issued the ln -s from my home, then cd to the directory containing the sources, from where i issued make: deb64:/home/francesco# ln - /usr/bin/gcc-4.1 /usr/local/bin/gcc cd gmmx deb64:/home/francesco/gmmx# make whereby a large number of lines where shown consecutively, of the type gcc -g -02 -c -o utility.o utility.c where utility.c is a file owned francesco francesco (date when the tarball was unzipped and untared), present before make, and utility.o, owned root root (date when make was issued), was generated following the command. the sequence ended with: gcc -g -o gmmx03 active.o angles.o attach.o column.o dolastat.o diagc.o Then, after other lines of text main.o: In function 'main': /home/francesco/gmmx/main.c: 71: warning: the 'gets' function is dangerous and should not be used. deb64: /home/francesco/gmmx# where <gmmx03> is the name of the tarball. I do not yet understand if something positive happened, but surely your suggestion has broken the ice. Thank you. (should you understand from the above description, please tell me) francesco pietra On Wednesday 07 June 2006 15:57, Matthias Julius wrote: > Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wednesday 07 June 2006 00:05, Matthias Julius wrote: > >> # ln -s /usr/bin/gcc-4.1 /usr/local/bin/gcc > > And did you try to create a gcc symlink? > > Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]