On Monday 26 June 2006 19:46, Stefano Simonucci wrote: > On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 16:14 +0100, Jo Shields wrote: > > We make extensive use of Portland, Intel and GNU compilers (both C and > > Fortran) at work - all of them work fine, and there are certainly no > > issues with G77 on AMD64. That said, our GAMESS installation was > > compiled with Intel 9.0 (as GNU is almost always considerably slower > > than PGI or Intel) > > I have used the Intel compiler to compile my programs and I have not > seen improvement with respect to GNU fortran. > > Stefano
Stefano, accepting your experience I started preparing Makefile.config indicaring g77 for Fortran and gcc for C (I am at amd64 debian etch, parallel machine dual opteron) yesterday I went on obtaining successfully makefile.config and an invite to run make, although none of the mathem libraries had been found. The program specifically said "should I proceed without"? I said yes, but I did not run make. To day #apt-file update #apt-file search returns /usr/lib/libatlas.a /usr/lib/libblas.a which are just two of the mathematic files requested by ./configure Making clear that I have /usr/lib /usr/lib64-> lib [where /lib only contains 64bit libraries (I have purged from lib32 that base installation had provided)] looking into /usr/lib I only found libblas.so.3 -> libblas.so.3.0 libblas.so.3.0 not exacly what ap-file search had indicated. Is that correct? Moreover (although this may be too much to ask because it may be specific of the software), I should manually (the software is not yet automatic from this viewpoint) indicate in Makefile.config where the libs have to be searched nano examination of Makefile.config reveals empty MPI_INCLUDE_DIR = MPI_LIB_PATH = MPI_LIB = Does this make clear where the libs should be indicated? Thanks a lot to all guys suggesting me how to go on francesco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
