On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:45:14PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > > > I (vaguely) know the reasons for all that, being intrinsic to the > > rules of Debian. However, it remains that such deb compilations are a > > waste of time from both the side of the maintainers and the users. I > > hope a day will come when a general arrangement will be found to save > > time from both sides. > > If you think the package should not be included in a stable release, > feel free to contact the package maintainer. The volatile archive may > be a more appropriate place for this. It's really up to the maintainers > whether they want to maintain it in volatile vs. stable.
Or maybe it belongs in backports? -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110120013246.gb8...@topoi.pooq.com
