* Daniel Stone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 02:12:39PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 07:57:35PM +0100, GCS wrote: > > > Package: apache2 > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > I do not know if it's by any means possible, but as both libdb4.1-dev and > > > libdb4.2-dev provides libdb-dev, would it be possible to depend -dev > > > packages on that? > > > > That sounds dangerous; as I understand it, it's necessary for everything > > that depends on libapr0 to use the same version of Berkeley DB. > > It's a really bad idea, yes.
> > On a similar note, though, db4.2 is now in unstable, so will the next > > version of apache2 use it? Uploads of new upstream versions of > > subversion are waiting for this to happen. (I scanned the debian-apache > > archives but couldn't find any mention of this.) > > Thom committed a change to libdb4.2-dev to apache2 HEAD[1] yesterday, > IIRC. > Correct. I need to write some debconf notification since the upgrade is manual and potentially destructive. Blah. -Thom
